98%
921
2 minutes
20
Adenine base editors (ABEs) and cytosine base editors (CBEs) are prominent tools for precise genome editing but are hindered by limited editing activity at positions proximal to the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). This study investigates the potential of enhancing base editors editing activity by fusing them with RNA-DNA hybrid binding domains (RHBDs). Specifically, fusing ABE8e with the RHBD of Homo sapiens RNaseH1 (RHBD1) significantly increased A-to-G editing efficiency in the PAM-proximal region (A9-A15) by up to 3.5-fold, while reducing off-target cytosine editing. Additionally, RHBD1 is compatible with ABEmax, BE4max, and dual base editor (eA&C-BEmax), enhancing their editing activity at the PAM-proximal bases. Notably, RHBD1-fused BE4max led to a 3.1-fold improvement in C-to-T editing efficiency at PAM-proximal region (C9-C12). Furthermore, we demonstrated that RHBD1-fused ABE8e could effectively edit disease-related single nucleotide variations (SNVs) in human cells and validated its efficacy in adult mouse liver. These findings highlight the significance of the RHBD in expanding editing window and the applicability of base editors for gene therapy and disease modeling.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.06.024 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Monit Comput
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, originally developed for intravenous drug administration of anesthetic drugs, enable precise drug delivery based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models. While widely used in the operating room, their application in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited despite the complexity of drug dosing in critically ill patients. This scoping review evaluates existing evidence on the use of TCI systems in ICU settings, focusing on sedation, analgesia, and antibiotic administration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Ther Nucleic Acids
September 2025
State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanisms Research for Major Diseases, Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Suzhou 215123, China.
Adenine base editors (ABEs) enable efficient A-to-G base conversions in genomic DNA, serving as powerful tools for basic research and clinical disease treatment. TadA-8e with high processive and compatibility makes ABE8e to be the most widely used adenine base editor and has also facilitated the creation of more elegant base editors based on TadA-8e fusion, such as AYBE and eA&C-BEmax. However, ABE8e has more off-target events including DNA off-target and RNA off-target, which raises safety concerns for precision gene editing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlant Biotechnol J
September 2025
National key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, International Research Center for Plant Cell Wall, College of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Cell Chem Biol
September 2025
Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, Sanya, China. Electronic address:
Genetic mutations are closely linked to human diseases, yet the relationship between many mutations and their corresponding phenotypes remains poorly understood. Furthermore, tools to study the connection between nucleotide variations and phenotypes are limited. To address this issue, we developed ACGBEmax by fusing the dual-functional deaminase, engineered N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase, and evolved SOS response associated peptidase domain with nCas9(D10A).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFbioRxiv
August 2025
Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
DNA base editing is increasingly used for human genetic modification, but methods for monitoring off-target editing are nascent. Here we present a simple model-independent workflow for identifying sites of off-target base-editing in relevant cell types on a genome-wide level. We report that sites of off-target editing by the ABE8e editor could be identified using an ABE8e derivative with restored DSB cleavage activity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF