98%
921
2 minutes
20
Understanding the relationship between the Objective Response Rate (ORR) and survival outcomes, notably Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), is relevant for assessing the efficacy of regimens in oncology. We evaluate the relationship between ORR, PFS and OS in immuno-oncology (IO) trials. Data from 68 clinical trials submitted to the FDA were evaluated, examining immunotherapy regimens, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 [anti-PD-(L)1], cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and combination therapies [e.g., IO + IO, anti-PD-L1 + chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1 + CTLA-4, anti-PD-L1 + TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitors)]. Studies were included based on their reporting of ORR, PFS, and OS. Of the 68 clinical trials reviewed, 55 were included in the analysis. The correlation between ORR and PFS was moderate across most immunotherapy regimens, indicating that ORR can serve as a useful predictor of short-term disease control. However, the correlation between ORR and OS was weaker, especially in trials including combination therapies, indicating that ORR alone may not reliably predict long-term survival outcomes. ORR predicts PFS better in first-line treatment but declines in later lines and remains a weak OS predictor overall. Differing degrees of correlation between ORR and survival metrics, particularly across treatment lines and combinations, are observed. While ORR can serve as a surrogate marker for PFS in IO trials, its utility in predicting OS is restricted and the interpretation of the relationship between ORR and PFS or OS is a key limitation. Rather, a decline in PFS with increasing ORR may reflect trial differences rather than a direct relationship. Future analyses should adopt better methodologies to capture these dynamics and focus on improving surrogate endpoints for immunotherapy to improve clinical trial design and patient outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815975 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030495 | DOI Listing |
Oncologist
September 2025
Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Background: THP (trastuzumab + paclitaxel + pertuzumab) and THPy (trastuzumab + paclitaxel + pyrotinib) are widely used as first-line regimens for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China. However, direct comparative data on their efficacy and safety remain scarce. This study evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes of THPy and THP in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC to guide clinical decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Med
December 2025
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background: Although some studies have indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitors are beneficial for the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer, evidence regarding the assessment of clinical response remains insufficient. Therefore, this study aims not only to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer, but also to analyze the objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR), providing comprehensive clinical outcome insights.
Materials And Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.
J Immunother Cancer
September 2025
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background: Peltopepimut-S is a therapeutic vaccine, which induces specific expansion of both CD4+helper and CD8+cytotoxic T-cells against human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6/E7 oncoproteins.
Patients And Methods: In a randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of peltopepimut-S plus cemiplimab compared with cemiplimab alone as first-line or second-line therapy in recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by an independent review (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Roche Products India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Introduction: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody-drug conjugate, targets tumor cells overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This single-arm, phase IV study assessed the safety and efficacy of T-DM1 in Indian patients with HER2-positive, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane.
Methods: Patients received T-DM1 (3.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Department of Hematology, General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Objective: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T) is a preferred treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Several trials have evaluated CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) as subsequent therapy in R/R LBCL. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of CD20×CD3 BsAbs (mosunetuzumab, glofitamab, odronextamab, and epcoritamab) in patients with LBCL who experienced relapse or refractory disease following CAR-T therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF