Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have improved the adenoma detection rate (ADR); however, concerns about its long-term effect on endoscopists' performance without CADe and potential deskilling remain unaddressed. This study evaluated the impact of CADe on the learning curve of endoscopists for adenoma detection.This propensity score-matching, prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2023. CADe systems were installed in half of the endoscopy units, and patients were equally distributed between the rooms. Patients aged ≥20 years scheduled for colonoscopy were included, excluding those with polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease, known polyps, incomplete colonoscopy, emergency cases, or previous colorectal surgery, and those examined by novices. Endoscopists were classified as high detectors (ADR ≥25%) or low detectors (ADR <25%) based on the ADR recorded before CADe implementation. To assess skill acquisition and transfer, the primary outcome was the change in ADR over time, as measured by cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis, in both CADe and non-CADe procedures.Of 18 962 patients who underwent colonoscopy, 13 245 patients were excluded, and of the 5717 patients initially enrolled, 4712 (CADe group, n = 2356; non-CADe group, n = 2356) were analyzed after propensity score matching. CUSUM analysis showed that both high and low detectors achieved enhanced detection performance for CADe procedures. Among non-CADe procedures, high detectors had accelerated learning curves, indicating they maintained a higher ADR, whereas low detectors showed no significant change in their learning trajectory.After CADe implementation, the detection rate in procedures performed without CADe was maintained and did not decline over time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2661-2624DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adenoma detection
8
observational study
8
cade systems
8
detectors adr
8
long-term impact
4
impact computer-aided
4
computer-aided adenoma
4
detection prospective
4
prospective observational
4
study computer-aided
4

Similar Publications

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk models routinely adjust for endoscopic screening because of a) possible confounding with other risk factors and b) possible alteration of natural history of the disease due to adenoma detection and removal.

Methods: In this study, we defined a subject as screen-covered (SC) if a colonoscopy was performed in the past 10 years, and not screen-covered (NSC) otherwise. We created CRC risk models separately for SC and NSC subjects (HRSC, HRNSC) and then obtained a screening-coverage adjusted HR estimate (HRfull) based on a weighted average of ln(HRSC) and ln(HRNSC) with weight equal to the proportion of SC person-time in the NHS population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The diagnosis of precancerous lesions of colorectal cancer (CRC) presents significant challenges in clinical practice. In this study, we conducted a clinical investigation using the UCAD technique after analyzing chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from various pathological stages, aiming to evaluate the value of detecting chromosomal instability (CIN) in CRC diagnosis.

Methods: Based on colonoscopic pathological findings, we selected 39 FFPE specimens of tubular adenomas, 8 FFPE specimens of villous adenomas, 16 cases diagnosed as tubular-villous adenomas, and 14 cases without defined pathological subtype classification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening modality for colorectal cancer; however, it is operator-dependent and reliant on exam quality. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection and clinical outcomes, but this is a sociotechnical challenge that requires effective human-AI teaming incorporating provider attitudes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating attitudes and perspectives of providers toward AI-assisted colonoscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Guidelines recommend leaving in situ rectosigmoid polyps diagnosed during colonoscopy that are 5 mm or smaller if the endoscopist optically predicts them to be non-neoplastic. However, no randomised controlled trial has been done to examine the efficacy and safety of this strategy.

Methods: This open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial enrolled adults age 18 years or older undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or clinical indications across four Italian centres.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool tests (mt-sDNA or FIT): Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Gastrointest Endosc

September 2025

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH.

Background And Aims: Data comparing the location of polyp yield in patients with positive stool tests can aid screening test selection. We conducted a cross sectional analysis of New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to compare the location, left versus right side of the colon, of neoplasia detected on colonoscopy following a mt-sDNA+ or FIT+ test as compared to a reference group having colonoscopy without a stool test.

Methods: Our outcomes were advanced lesions (adenoma and/or serrated polyp, including cancer), advanced adenomas (AA), or advanced serrated polyps (ASP), stratified by location.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF