Background And Aims: Data comparing the location of polyp yield in patients with positive stool tests can aid screening test selection. We conducted a cross sectional analysis of New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to compare the location, left versus right side of the colon, of neoplasia detected on colonoscopy following a mt-sDNA+ or FIT+ test as compared to a reference group having colonoscopy without a stool test.
Methods: Our outcomes were advanced lesions (adenoma and/or serrated polyp, including cancer), advanced adenomas (AA), or advanced serrated polyps (ASP), stratified by location.
Background And Aim: Our goal was to inform endoscopist practice by exploring how the odds of advanced neoplasia in the right and left colon differ between men and women with and without prior positive stool tests.
Methods: Our primary outcome was advanced lesions (advanced adenomas, advanced serrated polyps, and/or colorectal cancer) found during colonoscopy. We used logistic regression to compare adjusted outcome odds by colon location (left or right), patient sex, and screening cohort.
Background And Aims: Our goal was to examine the association between smoking status (current, former, and never) and prevalence of advanced findings in patients with colonoscopy after a positive multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA), patients with colonoscopy after a positive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), and patients with colonoscopy only (no prior stool test).
Methods: Our main outcome was prevalence of advanced lesions (any colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced adenoma, or advanced serrated polyp). We also looked at advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps separately.
Background: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Adenomas and serrated polyps are precursors of colorectal cancer, with serrated polyps being more difficult to detect during colonoscopy. The relationship between propofol use and polyp detection remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Negative colonoscopies following positive stool tests could result from stool test characteristics or from the quality of endoscopist performance. We used New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to examine the association between endoscopist detection rates and polyp yield in colonoscopies performed for positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test to evaluate the degree to which positive stool tests followed by negative colonoscopy ("false positives") vary with endoscopist quality. In addition, we investigated the frequency of significant polyps in the subgroup of highest quality colonoscopies following positive stool tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe utilized the population-based New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry to calculate false discovery rates (FDR) and positive predictive values (PPVs) using three 'positive' colonoscopy definitions. Understanding the frequency of meaningful 'true positive' mt-sDNA and Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) results can optimize the use of these colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests. We calculated FDR (positive stool test followed by negative colonoscopy divided by all positive stool tests) and PPV for mt-sDNA and FIT cohorts using the following definitions: 1) DeeP-C Study (CRC, adenomas/serrated polyps ≥ 1 cm, villous/High Grade Dysplasia); 2) < 10 year US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) follow-up: DeeP-C findings & ≥1 sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) < 1 cm (with/without dysplasia) or ≥ 1 tubular adenomas < 1 cm.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
February 2023
Background: Stool-based screening with fecal immunochemical (FIT) or multitarget-stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests is associated with increased colonoscopy polyp yield. mt-sDNA includes methylated markers, which improve detection of serrated polyps (SP) versus FIT. We compared SP detection in colonoscopies performed for positive FIT or mt-sDNA tests, as well as in colonoscopies without a preceding stool test, using the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, a comprehensive statewide population-based registry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after cardiac surgery. While AKI severity is known to be associated with increased risk of short-term outcomes, its long-term impact is less well understood.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery at eight centers were enrolled into the Northern New England biomarker registry (n = 1,610).
Background: Dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (AKI-D) is a documented complication of hospitalization and procedures. Temporal incidence of AKI-D and related hospital mortality in the US population has not been recently characterized. We describe the epidemiology of AKI-D as well as associated in-hospital mortality in the US.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF