A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Head-to-head comparison of peptide-based and nanobody-based radiotracers in detecting PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy based on programmed cell death protein receptor 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) has become an important method for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Peptide-based and nanobody-based PET tracers offer potential advantages in PD-L1 detection, yet their comparative tumor uptake and biodistribution remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 (a peptide-based tracer) and [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 (a nanobody-based tracer) in assessing PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic NSCLC, providing insights for future radiotracer design and theranostic applications.

Methods: Ten patients diagnosed with NSCLC underwent [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 and [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 PET/CT scans, with four of these patients also receiving [F]FDG PET/CT scans. The tracer uptakes, quantified by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and target-to-background ratio (TBR), were compared between [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 and [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 PET/CT.

Results: DOTA-WL12 and NOTA-RW102 exhibited favorable binding affinities with PD-L1, with equilibrium dissociation constant (K) values of 0.2 nM and 0.0047 nM, respectively. Subsequent human studies revealed significant variations (P < 0.05) in the uptake of [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 and [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 across the liver (SUVmean: 20.43 ± 4.26 vs. 6.12 ± 1.36, p = 0.015), kidney (SUVmean: 2.40 ± 0.34 vs. 22.37 ± 2.88, P = 0.015), spleen (SUVmean: 2.44 ± 0.67 vs. 18.49 ± 3.90, P = 0.015), and lung background (SUVmean: 0.18 ± 0.12 vs. 1.09 ± 0.29, P = 0.015). Meanwhile, we found that the correlation between SUVmax and PD-L1 TPS was significantly stronger with [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 compared to [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102 (P < 0.0001, r = 0.9471 vs. P = 0.0241, r = 0.5235).

Conclusion: The uptake of peptide-based [Ga]Ga-DOTA-WL12 was more strongly correlated with PD-L1 TPS in primary and metastatic tumor lesions compared to [Ga]Ga-NOTA-RW102. They also displayed different distribution, suggesting that peptide-based and nanobody-based radiotracers may have different clinical implications, particularly in radiotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07316-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peptide-based nanobody-based
8
pd-l1 expression
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
[ga]ga-dota-wl12 [ga]ga-nota-rw102
8
pet/ct scans
8
standardized uptake
8
head-to-head comparison
4
comparison peptide-based
4

Similar Publications