Article Synopsis

  • The EVAN study compared the effectiveness and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin in patients with fully resected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations.
  • At the 43-month follow-up, erlotinib showed significantly better median overall survival (84.2 months) compared to chemotherapy (61.1 months), along with higher 5-year disease-free survival rates (48.2% for erlotinib vs. 46.2% for chemotherapy).
  • The study is notable for being the first to illustrate a significant overall survival benefit with erlotinib in this patient group, along with findings on genetic variants affecting outcomes.

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

JCO The randomized, open-label, phase II EVAN study investigated the efficacy (disease-free survival [DFS] and 5-year overall survival [OS]) and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) for stage III epidermal growth factor receptor () mutation+ non-small-cell lung cancer. We describe the updated results at the 43-month follow-up. In EVAN, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to erlotinib (n = 51) or vinorelbine/cisplatin (n = 51). The median follow-up was 54.8 and 63.9 months in the erlotinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. With erlotinib, the respective 5-year DFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 48.2% (95% CI, 29.4 to 64.7) and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.6 to 62.9) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The median OS was 84.2 months with erlotinib versus 61.1 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.151 to 0.670). The 5-year survival rates were 84.8% and 51.1% with erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In whole-exome sequencing analysis, frequent genes with variants co-occurring at baseline were , , , , and . With erlotinib, a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation in was associated with significantly worse DFS ( = .01). To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS improvement with adjuvant erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in R0 stage III EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00428DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

erlotinib versus
12
non-small-cell lung
12
lung cancer
12
erlotinib
9
phase evan
8
evan study
8
epidermal growth
8
growth factor
8
5-year survival
8
stage iii
8

Similar Publications

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of lung cancer cases globally and most patients receive their diagnosis at advanced or metastatic disease stages. The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib (first-generation) and osimertinib (third-generation) to treat NSCLC is possible because of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Although osimertinib has shown better results in recent trials, direct and updated comparisons with erlotinib, especially in combination regimens, are still limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: What are the molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia-induced male reproductive impairment?

Summary Answer: Hypoxia compromises Septin2 () transcription in spermatogonia, which impedes spermatogonial proliferation through protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)-dependent AKT dephosphorylation.

What Is Known Already: Hypoxia is associated with impaired spermatogenesis and poor sperm parameters in men. Spermatogonia proliferation, a crucial early step in spermatogenesis, is essential for maintaining the spermatogenic cell population and ensuring sperm quality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The clinical characteristics and outcomes of younger versus older patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC undergoing first-line EGFR-TKI treatment remain underexplored.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed patients treated between 2010 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point) was reported in the phase 3 RELAY study with ramucirumab (RAM) plus erlotinib (ERL) versus placebo (PL) in untreated -mutated NSCLC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Platinum-refractory advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has poor outcomes and limited treatment options, especially in resource-constrained settings. Triple oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMCT), involving low-dose continuous administration of chemotherapeutic agents, has shown promise in phase II studies but lacks evidence from randomized controlled trials. This study evaluated whether triple OMCT improves overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy of physician discretion (CPD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF