98%
921
2 minutes
20
Entecavir treatment failure can be observed in compliant patients despite an absence of detectable resistance mutations by Pol/RT Sanger sequencing. We hypothesized that these unexplained treatment failures could rely on other mechanisms of viral resistance, especially on mutations selected outside of the Pol/RT domain. Partial virological response to entecavir was observed in three patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, without selection of Pol/RT resistance mutations. Mutations selected in the whole HBV genome during entecavir treatment and potentially associated with resistance were searched for using deep sequencing and characterized using a phenotypic resistance assay. Mutations Q206K (pre-core/core), Q120K (pre-S1/pre-S2, T-cell epitope) and A300E (spacer domain) were selected during entecavir treatment in patient #1 but were not associated with an increased level of resistance to entecavir or an increase in HBV replication capacity. Core promoter mutations T1753G, A1762T and G1764A were present as major mutations before and after treatment in patient #1. HBs Ag immune escape mutations were present as major mutations before and after treatment in patients #2 (sK122R, sT126I, sP127S and sG145R) and #3 (sM133I). We demonstrated that PVR to entecavir does not require selection of any resistance mutation in the whole HBV genome. Our results demonstrate that major mutations can be selected outside of the Pol/RT domain before or during entecavir treatment. These mutations could contribute to entecavir treatment failure by other mechanisms than an increased level of resistance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105106 | DOI Listing |
JHEP Rep
October 2025
Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background & Aims: Conflicting evidence exists on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving tenofovir entecavir. We assessed the impacts of the two drugs on the clinical trajectory of CHB at a population level.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, including 55,885 patients with CHB who were treatment-naïve aged 30-75 years receiving tenofovir (n = 17,137) or entecavir (n = 38,748) monotherapy for ≥3 months between November 2009 and December 2020, and followed until December 2022.
Front Med (Lausanne)
August 2025
The First Department of Liver Disease Center, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Introduction: Low-level viremia (LLV) is associated with the progression of liver fibrosis and a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The present study aimed to compare the efficacy between nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy and combination therapy of NAs and pegylated interferon-α (pegIFN-α) in entecavir (ETV)-treated CHB patients with LLV.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Department of Surgical Oncology, Central Hospital of Guangdong Provincial Nongken, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Microsatellite-stable (MSS) rectal adenocarcinoma remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complicating factors such as chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have introduced new opportunities to improve the treatment outcomes in this subset, yet their application in HBV-positive cancer patients is less well understood. Here we report the case of a 46-year-old female with MSS locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma and active HBV infection, successfully treated with cmFOLFOXIRI combined with camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
August 2025
Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) have demonstrated potent efficacy in suppressing viral replication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This 48-week study compared the efficacy and safety of NA treatment for CHB patients with high viral load (hepatitis B virus [HBV] deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] > 7 log10 IU/mL). This retrospective study included 180 nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB patients with high viral load undergoing NA monotherapy, which were stratified into 3 groups: entecavir (ETV, n = 82), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, n = 58), and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF, n = 40).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPeerJ
September 2025
Department of Liver Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Background: For individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) at higher risk of nephrotoxicity, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are recommended antiviral options. This study aimed to investigate kidney safety among treatment-naïve individuals with CHB receiving TAF versus ETV.
Method: Treatment-naïve individuals with CHB receiving either TAF or ETV from July 2019 to December 2020 were included.