Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Delayed treatment of seriously infected patients results in increased mortality. However, antimicrobial therapy for the initial 24 to 48 hours is mostly empirically provided, without evidence regarding the causative pathogen. Whether empiric anti-enterococcal therapy should be administered to treat intra-abdominal infection (IAI) before obtaining culture results remains unknown. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the effects of empiric enterococci covered antibiotic therapy in IAI and the risk factors for enterococcal infection in IAI. We searched multiple databases systematically and included 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 observational studies. The quality of included studies was assessed, and the reporting bias was evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects or fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity. The risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Enterococci-covered antibiotic regimens provided no improvement in treatment success compared with control regimens (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; p = 0.15), with similar mortality and adverse effects in both arms. Basic characteristic analysis revealed that most of the enrolled patients with IAI in RCTs were young, lower risk community-acquired intra-abdominal infection (CA-IAI) patients with a relatively low APACHE II score. Interestingly, risk factor screening revealed that malignancy, corticosteroid use, operation, any antibiotic treatment, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), and indwelling urinary catheter could predispose the patients with IAI to a substantially higher risk of enterococcal infection. "Hospital acquired" itself was a risk factor (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.34-3.39; p < 0.001). It is unnecessary to use additional agents empirically to specifically provide anti-enterococcal coverage for the management of CA-IAI in lower risk patients without evidence of causative pathogen, and risk factors can increase the risk of enterococcal infection. Thus, there is a rationale for providing empiric anti-enterococcal coverage for severely ill patients with CA-IAI with high risk factors and patients with hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infection (HA-IAI).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intra-abdominal infection
12
empiric anti-enterococcal
8
anti-enterococcal therapy
8
infection iai
8
enterococcal infection
8
patients iai
8
risk factor
8
risk
6
infection
5
iai
5

Similar Publications

Objective: To study opinions of pediatric surgeons on technical aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

Material And Methods: An anonymous survey of surgeons was used as the main research method (Google Forms platform). Invitations were sent to specialized institutions (emergency pediatric surgery departments).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report here the results of the 9th National Census (Cs-24) of Peritoneal Dialysis in Italy, carried out in 2025 by the Italian Society of Nephrology's Peritoneal Dialysis Project Group and relating to 2024. The Census was conducted in the 228 non pediatric centers which performed Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) in 2024. The results have been compared with previous Censuses carried out since 2005.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic Management of Grade C Anastomotic Leak following Left-Sided Colorectal Resection.

JSLS

September 2025

Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Specialists, Jackson Medical Group, Jackson S. Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA. (Drs. Altamirano, Adogowa, and Lujan).

Background: Management of left-sided colorectal Grade C anastomotic leak (AL) has traditionally been managed via laparotomy. However, with the growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, recent literature suggests that laparoscopic surgery provides a safe and viable alternative for managing Grade C leaks.

Methods: This study is a case series that consists of 7 adults that underwent laparoscopic reintervention of purulent or feculent peritonitis from left-sided colorectal AL during the period of 2016-2024 at our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are the two primary renal replacement therapies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While PD is an effective and convenient modality, long-term use can lead to ultrafiltration failure, recurrent peritonitis, and progressive structural alterations in the peritoneal membrane, necessitating a transition to HD. In recent years, rather than a complete transition, the combined use of PD and HD has emerged as a viable alternative, offering potential advantages for selected patient populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intravenous lipid emulsions are a key component of parenteral nutrition, and their fatty acid compositions may influence immune responses and clinical outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2020 to December 2022 compared clinical outcomes of hospitalized non-critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition with either mixed oil or soybean oil lipid emulsions for at least 48 h. The primary outcome was a composite of the presence of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or an intra-abdominal collection diagnosed within 14 days of initiating parenteral nutrition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF