98%
921
2 minutes
20
Biomaterial cues can act as potent regulators of cell niche and microenvironment. Epigenetic regulation plays an important role in cell functions, including proliferation, differentiation, and reprogramming. It is now well appreciated that biomaterials can alter epigenetic states of cells. In this study, we systematically reviewed the underlying epigenetic mechanisms of how different biomaterial cues, including material chemistry, topography, elasticity, and mechanical stimulus, influence cell functions, such as nuclear deformation, cell proliferation, differentiation, and reprogramming, to summarize the differences and similarities among each biomaterial cues and their mechanisms, and to find common and unique properties of different biomaterial cues. Moreover, this work aims to establish a mechanogenomic map facilitating highly functionalized biomaterial design, and renders new thoughts of epigenetic regulation in controlling cell fates in disease treatment and regenerative medicine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2017.0287 | DOI Listing |
Nat Mater
September 2025
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Within most tissues, the extracellular microenvironment provides mechanical cues that guide cell fate and function. Changes in the extracellular matrix such as aberrant deposition, densification and increased crosslinking are hallmarks of late-stage fibrotic diseases that often lead to organ dysfunction. Biomaterials have been widely used to mimic the mechanical properties of the fibrotic matrix and study pathophysiologic cell function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Bioeng Biotechnol
August 2025
Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major global health burden due to its high recurrence and mortality rates. For patients with advanced HCC and compromised liver function, Pharmacotherapy has become the primary approach due to the limited efficacy of conventional treatments (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Texture Stud
October 2025
Division of Physiology, Kyushu Dental University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Food texture is a pivotal factor influencing consumer preference, acceptance, and eating experience. Although human sensory studies have underscored the importance of the sensations of springiness and hardness in mastication and swallowing, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown due to the lack of an animal model. We therefore hypothesized that rats can discriminate textures based on mechanical properties-springiness and hardness-independent of taste, odor, and visual cues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Nanobiotechnology
September 2025
Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Irregular alveolar bone defects pose persistent clinical challenges due to their complex morphology and the lack of biomaterials that simultaneously provide structural integrity, biocompatibility, and dynamic osteoinductive potential. Herein, we report a fiber-reinforced, dual-network hydrogel system (OHADN fiber@Yoda1 hydrogel) engineered to recapitulate mechanobiological cues for enhanced bone regeneration. This injectable hydrogel integrates oxidized hyaluronic acid (OHA) crosslinked with Yoda1-loaded PLGA-collagen fiber fragments and stabilized via catechol-Fe³⁺ coordination, forming a robust and self-healing structure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Control Release
September 2025
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, PR China.
Structural DNA nanotechnology has emerged as a powerful tool in modern medicine, offering precise self-assembly and spatial programmability for the design of functional nanocarriers. DNA nanostructures can be categorized into one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) architectures, each with distinct advantages: 1D structures are suited for studying cellular responses to physical cues, 2D structures provide large surface areas for enhanced molecular recognition, and 3D structures enable improved cellular uptake and tissue penetration. Despite their potential, there is still no widespread consensus on the optimal structural design for specific diseases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF