Cholesterol Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.

N Engl J Med

From the Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences (S.Y., J.B., R.M., J.P., H.J., P.G., E.L.), Departments of Medicine (S.Y., R.M., E.L.) and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.P.), and School of Rehabilitation Science (J.B.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Institut

Published: May 2016


Article Synopsis

  • Previous trials suggest statins lower cardiovascular risk but mostly involved white individuals with high lipid levels; this study seeks to examine the effects in an intermediate-risk, diverse population without existing cardiovascular disease.
  • The trial randomly assigned 12,705 participants to receive either rosuvastatin or a placebo, measuring outcomes related to cardiovascular events over a median follow-up of 5.6 years.
  • Results showed a significant reduction in both primary outcome events (e.g., heart attacks and strokes) for those on rosuvastatin compared to placebo, with no major increase in diabetes or cancer risks, though there was a slightly higher rate of cataract surgeries in the rosuvastatin group.

Video Abstracts

Carlos Pérez

August 7, 2022

102 views


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Previous trials have shown that the use of statins to lower cholesterol reduces the risk of cardiovascular events among persons without cardiovascular disease. Those trials have involved persons with elevated lipid levels or inflammatory markers and involved mainly white persons. It is unclear whether the benefits of statins can be extended to an intermediate-risk, ethnically diverse population without cardiovascular disease.

Methods: In one comparison from a 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned 12,705 participants in 21 countries who did not have cardiovascular disease and were at intermediate risk to receive rosuvastatin at a dose of 10 mg per day or placebo. The first coprimary outcome was the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, and the second coprimary outcome additionally included revascularization, heart failure, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. The median follow-up was 5.6 years.

Results: The overall mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 26.5% lower in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group. The first coprimary outcome occurred in 235 participants (3.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and in 304 participants (4.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.91; P=0.002). The results for the second coprimary outcome were consistent with the results for the first (occurring in 277 participants [4.4%] in the rosuvastatin group and in 363 participants [5.7%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P<0.001). The results were also consistent in subgroups defined according to cardiovascular risk at baseline, lipid level, C-reactive protein level, blood pressure, and race or ethnic group. In the rosuvastatin group, there was no excess of diabetes or cancers, but there was an excess of cataract surgery (in 3.8% of the participants, vs. 3.1% in the placebo group; P=0.02) and muscle symptoms (in 5.8% of the participants, vs. 4.7% in the placebo group; P=0.005).

Conclusions: Treatment with rosuvastatin at a dose of 10 mg per day resulted in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events than placebo in an intermediate-risk, ethnically diverse population without cardiovascular disease. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and AstraZeneca; HOPE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00468923.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600176DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coprimary outcome
16
cardiovascular disease
12
rosuvastatin group
12
placebo group
12
persons cardiovascular
8
second coprimary
8
group hazard
8
hazard ratio
8
cardiovascular
6
group
6

Similar Publications

Background: Clinical communication is central to the delivery of effective, timely, and safe patient care. The use of text-based tools for clinician-to-clinician communication-commonly referred to as secure messaging-has increased exponentially over the past decade. The use of secure messaging has a potential impact on clinician work behaviors, workload, and cognitive burden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Excessive and improper use of antimicrobials is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) addresses this by promoting judicious use of antimicrobials. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of an AMS program in district hospitals in Vietnam.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patient-Reported Symptoms and Direct Health Care Costs in Head and Neck Cancer.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

September 2025

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Importance: Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its associated treatments are associated with substantial functional, psychological, and financial consequences. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) play a crucial role in capturing the full impact of disease. Understanding how PROMs are associated with health care costs is critical for cancer care planning; however, the association of health care expenditure and PROMs is yet to be clarified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) at risk of HIV frequently have symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs), which are associated with lower pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence. We conducted a pilot hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (CHOMA) to evaluate whether an evidence-based mental health intervention adapted for PrEP delivery ("Youth Friendship Bench SA") could address CMD and PrEP adherence among South African AGYW.

Methods: CHOMA was conducted in Johannesburg from April 2023 to February 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Time-to-treatment goals for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have substantially improved outcomes, yet similar metrics have not been studied in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), where mortality rates are much higher.

Methods: Multicenter, observational retrospective study of patients with ICH and AIS between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, in 11 comprehensive stroke centers across the United States participating in Get With The Guidelines. We included patients with ICH who received antihypertensive therapy and anticoagulation reversal, and patients with AIS requiring intravenous thrombolytic and mechanical thrombectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF