98%
921
2 minutes
20
PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08901171251371447 | DOI Listing |
J Sci Food Agric
September 2025
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Storage, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China.
Background: Apple pomace (AP), a byproduct of apple processing, is nutrient-rich, and its properties are influenced by both the quality of the apples and the juice extraction process. Drying technology can enhance its economic utilization. This study compared the effects of industrial drum drying (ID) and laboratory hot-air drying, heat pump drying and freeze drying (FD) on the physicochemical, functional and structural properties of from-concentrate AP (FC-AP) and not-from-concentrate AP (NFC-AP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Food Prot
September 2025
Department of Processing Technology, Nofima AS, 4021 Stavanger.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of combining recyclable packaging materials in preserving the quality of microwave-treated chicken meat. Specifically, it assessed the combination of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) with modified atmosphere packaging (100% N and 60% CO:40% N). Quality parameters, such as cook loss, colour, microbiological stability, and sensory analysis, were monitored over 36 days.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlob Heart
September 2025
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Recent global estimates indicate that more than one billion people live with obesity, a figure that has doubled since 1990. When overweight individuals are included, nearly 2.5 billion adults are affected, with high body mass index contributing to an estimated 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOn October 17, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) formally established a new category of hearing aids (HAs), now available over the counter (OTC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Infect Control
September 2025
Department of Food Science, 745 Agricultural Mall Drive, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA 47907. Electronic address:
Background: Manual wiping of surfaces, a primary method in preventing hospital acquired infections, can vary significantly in its ability to eliminate bacteria and prevent cross-contamination.
Methods: Four liquid-based cleaning and disinfecting formulations comprised of hydrogen peroxide (HP), ethoxylated alcohol (EA), quaternary ammonium compounds (Quat and Quat2), or a water-based control were evaluated for their bactericidal efficacy in combination with three different wiping materials: microfiber, polypropylene, and cotton. Each chemistry and wipe combination were evaluated for its ability to reduce microbial contamination on a hard, non-porous surface measuring one meter.