98%
921
2 minutes
20
There continues to be a high prevalence of smoking in many European countries. In Germany, for example, there are over 20 million smokers, most of whom exhibit little desire to quit. In other countries, the adoption of smoke-free products (SFPs), including e-cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), and oral nicotine pouches (NPs), is helping smokers to transition away from cigarettes. In Germany, debate about SFPs primarily focuses on their potential harms to non-smokers, particularly the underage population. This debate seems one-sided: raising concerns alone does not sufficiently inform the 20 million smokers about the comparative health risks of cigarettes and SFPs, an issue increasingly echoed by practitioners and researchers. Instead, the current discourse is dominated by misconceptions, as evidenced by surveys on smokers' perceptions of the relative health risks of cigarettes and SFPs. Considering the gravity of the topic, it is essential to revisit the scientific facts. The growing evidence shows that SFPs, including ECs, HTPs, and NPs, expose users to significantly fewer numbers and lower concentrations of toxicants relative to combustible cigarettes. In vitro studies and biomarkers of harm in SFP users suggest that these lower emissions translate to reduced risks of harm. It is the nature of science that the evidence will never be complete, but the totality of data should be considered when discussing the correct handling of SFPs. At present, these data suggest that SFPs can play a useful role in curbing the individual and societal risks associated with smoking.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04093-0 | DOI Listing |
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica
August 2025
Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Background: Motivation for the study. Despite progress in tobacco control, the economic and disease burden in Peru remains high. Strengthening smoke-free regulations, implementing plain packaging, banning tobacco promotion and sponsorship, and increasing taxes could reduce it.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To assess the impact of comprehensive tobacco control policies on maternal smoking during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes over a 20-year period.
Design: Population-based cohort study using linked Scottish National Health Service. We assessed the impact of tobacco control measures on maternal smoking and perinatal outcomes over four distinct time periods.
J Dent
August 2025
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Center for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Objectives: To assess the completeness and quality of reporting of oral adverse events (OAEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated non-combustible nicotine products (NCNPs) and whether reporting practices have improved over time.
Data Sources And Study Selection: This secondary data analysis was based on 36 RCTs included in a previous systematic review. Trials involved adult smokers and included nicotine replacement therapy, electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco, and smokeless tobacco.
BMJ Open
August 2025
Institute for Social Marketing and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
Introduction: The harmful health effects of children's exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) are well established. Most SHS exposure now occurs in the home, in low-income households. Previous research suggests that using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the home can help with temporary smoking abstinence and could reduce smoking indoors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsian Pac J Cancer Prev
August 2025
Faculty of Economy and Business, Universitas Indonesia.
Objective: Kendari is located in Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia, with an estimated population of approximately 350,000. This study aimed to evaluate compliance with implementation of Kendari City Regulation No. 16 of 2014 on Smoke Free Zones (Perda KTR) across various facilities (public places, workplaces, educational environments, places of worship, healthcare facilities, children's play areas, sports facilities, and public transportation).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF