98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Advanced stages of prostate cancer (PCa), in particular metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway is a cornerstone of therapeutic intervention, but resistance mechanisms and disease progression demand increasingly complex treatment strategies.
Methods: This narrative review is based on expert consensus, supported by a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and the abstract databases of ASCO, ASCO GU and ESMO. Examples for novel treatment approaches were selected in order to illustrate current developments without claiming completeness.
Results: We provide a comprehensive overview on the management of metastatic PCa, highlighting the evolution of treatment approaches and their clinical implications. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of therapy, enhanced by androgen synthesis inhibitors, AR inhibitors, and emerging AR degraders. Taxane-based chemotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals like radium-223 and lutetium-177 PSMA-617, and PARP inhibitors have expanded the therapeutic arsenal. Novel treatment approaches are in pre-clinical and clinical development. Various factors must be taken into account when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy including disease and patient specific aspects. In addition, previous treatment lines may impact the efficacy of subsequent therapeutic approaches.
Conclusion: The growing number of treatment options and a better understanding of the biological processes involved in tumor progression and the development of resistance are enabling increasingly individualized treatment of patients with advanced PCa.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000546930 | DOI Listing |
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Urol Oncol
September 2025
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Objective: To examine differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients with vs. without secondary bladder cancer (BCa) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2000-2021), T1-T4N0M0 UTUC patients treated with RNU and diagnosed with secondary BCa were identified.
Eur Urol Oncol
September 2025
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address:
Background And Objective: The effect of family history (FH) on prostate cancer active surveillance outcomes is unknown. Our objective is to evaluate FH of prostate, breast, ovarian, and/or pancreatic cancer in a large prospective active surveillance cohort.
Methods: Patients with recorded FH data (N = 1421) were selected.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
October 2025
Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
October 2025
Division of Radiation oncology, Department of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: