Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The primary analysis of the ANNIE study demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity of the niraparib-anlotinib combination in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC). We report updated overall survival (OS) and safety data and the management of key treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) from the ANNIE study.

Methods: In the multi-center, single-arm, Phase 2 ANNIE study, enrolled patients received oral niraparib 200 mg or 300 mg (baseline bodyweight-directed) once daily and anlotinib 10 mg (12 mg before protocol amendment) once daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Safety management involved a multidisciplinary team comprising specialist physicians, who performed monitoring and intervention for key comorbidities and TEAEs.

Results: Forty patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 19.0 months, the updated median OS was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval: 12.1-not evaluable). The most common TEAEs were hypertension (n=22, 55%), leukopenia (n=18, 45%), hand-foot syndrome (n=17, 43%), thrombocytopenia (n=15, 38%), neutropenia (n=14, 35%), and hypertriglyceridemia (n=12, 30%). Hypertension and cardiovascular events were mostly managed by early interventions using beta-blockers. Hypertriglyceridemia was mostly managed using atorvastatin and simvastatin. Hematological toxicities were consistent with prior studies and no severe hematologic events occurred. Protocol amendment was implemented to reduce the incidence of hand-foot syndrome, while topical glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used in patients with apparent symptoms.

Conclusion: The updated OS analysis showed sustained long-term efficacy of niraparib-anlotinib in PROC patients. The safety data reflected satisfactory tolerability and adverse event management, supporting the involvement of a multidisciplinary disease management team in ovarian cancer care.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04376073.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12292356PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S526755DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse event
12
ovarian cancer
12
annie study
12
event management
8
safety data
8
protocol amendment
8
hand-foot syndrome
8
management
5
patients
5
management patients
4

Similar Publications

The Grams model, designed to predict adverse event risks in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, was evaluated in a Chinese cohort of 1,333 patients with eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m. The model demonstrated moderate to good discrimination across outcomes, performing well in predicting kidney replacement therapy (KRT) but overestimating the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanisms and treatment of cancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity.

Nat Rev Cancer

September 2025

Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Neurotoxicity is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from conventional and novel cancer therapy. The mechanisms that underlie clinical symptoms of central and peripheral nervous system injury remain incompletely understood. For conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy, direct toxicities to brain structures and neurovascular damage may result in myelin degradation and impaired neurogenesis, which eventually translates into delayed neurodegeneration accompanied by cognitive symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and chalazia are common disorders impacting quality of life. This population-based, pharmacovigilance study aims to identify systemic drugs disproportionately linked to these disorders.

Methods: Data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were analysed (Q4 2003 to Q2 2024).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

β-blocker and clinical outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Clin Pharmacol

September 2025

Department of Forensic Pathology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Background And Objective: While current clinical guidelines generally advocate for beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conflicting findings have surfaced through large-scale observational studies and meta-analyses. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies to quantify the long-term therapeutic impact of beta-blocker across heterogeneous AMI populations.

Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2000 to 2025 that examine the link between beta-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes (last search update: March 1, 2025).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan is a widely used cardiovascular agent characterized by its dual inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and neprilysin. However, existing evidence on the safety of sacubitril/valsartan is primarily limited to clinical studies; this results in an inability to provide a timely update on associated adverse events.

Aim: To mine and systematically describe adverse events related to sacubitril/valsartan from September 2015 to June 2024 using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF