98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether opioid-free anesthesia is non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia in terms of short-term recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups ( = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale ( > 0.05).
Conclusion: Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.
Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263370 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623 | DOI Listing |
Pediatr Crit Care Med
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Objective: To develop a set of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM).
Design: Survey and Delphi methodology in a panel of experts from the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) and the Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (EPIC) Research Collaborative.
Setting: Interprofessional local focus group, national focus group, and subsequent national multi-institutional, multidisciplinary expert panel in the United States.
Anesthesiology
October 2025
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Despite the widespread use of clinical anesthesia, the process of emergence from general anesthesia remains primarily driven by anesthetic elimination. Although emergence from general anesthesia is typically safe, prolonged delays strain resource-intensive settings and contribute to increased healthcare costs. In addition to improving access to care, providing clinicians with more precise control over emergence could offer diagnostic potential and improve patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnesthesiology
October 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Anesthetic exposure in young children raises concerns about neurodevelopmental safety, with preclinical evidence suggesting potential neurotoxicity of volatile anesthetics. This study aimed to assess whether the combination of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, by reducing sevoflurane exposure, has any differential effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes in young children compared with sevoflurane alone.
Methods: This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including children younger than 2 yr undergoing nonstaged, nonrepetitive surgeries.
Anesthesiology
October 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva Neuroscience Center, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Expert Rev Med Devices
September 2025
Department of Onco-anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. BRA IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Background: Tracheal intubation can be challenging, especially in unanticipated cases, where patient positioning plays a critical role. The bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position may improve intubation outcomes.
Research Design And Methods: This randomized non-inferiority trial included 90 ASA I - II patients undergoing elective surgery.