Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered the gold standard for the assessment of subjective symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and patient well-being in both clinical trials and clinical practice. Here, we report key discussions and findings from the 21st National Conference of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology, held in Bologna on 21-22 June 2024, with a focus on the integration and impact of PROs in oncology research and clinical practice.

Methods And Analysis: Leading national and international experts presented and analysed data regarding the use of PROs in clinical trials and routine oncology care. Topics included the role of electronic PROs (ePROs), digital therapeutics, financial toxicity as a PRO and methodologies for standardising QoL assessment. Insights were drawn from expert presentations, consensus discussions and practical experiences shared during the conference sessions.

Results: Experts emphasised that PROs should be included as key endpoints in clinical trials, with timely publication of results and standardised methodologies for analysis and interpretation. The conference highlighted the critical importance of incorporating PROs and QoL measures throughout the cancer care continuum-from screening to survivorship. In clinical practice, PROs improve patient-centred care and communication, particularly when oncologists are trained to interpret QoL data. The use of ePROs was noted as a valuable tool to support digital health interventions. Financial toxicity emerged as a significant PRO, with screening tools recommended to identify and support at-risk patients. Key organisational challenges were identified, including technological barriers, resource constraints and the need for responsive infrastructure to support real-time PRO integration.

Conclusion: The implementation of PROs, including ePROs and financial toxicity assessments, is essential for advancing quality cancer care. Standardisation, digital innovation and targeted clinician education are critical to integrating PROs effectively in both research and clinical settings. Addressing infrastructural and technological challenges will be vital for optimising patient outcomes and ensuring optimal care across the cancer journey.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182000PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2025-000783DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trials
16
clinical practice
12
financial toxicity
12
pros
10
clinical
9
patient-reported outcomes
8
outcomes pros
8
pros clinical
8
trials clinical
8
practice report
8

Similar Publications

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating neurological disease, and one of the primary drivers of morbidity after aneurysm rupture is the phenomenon of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Significant knowledge has been gained over the past two decades of the impact of neuroinflammation in DCI; and neutrophils are now believed to play a major role. There is significant human subject data showing the rise of neutrophil related inflammatory markers and neutrophil's association with poor outcome after aSAH, but as of yet no trials involving human subjects have been done specifically targeting neutrophils.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims And Objective: The field of medical statistics has experienced significant advancements driven by integrating innovative statistical methodologies. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis to explore current trends, influential research areas, and future directions in medical statistics.

Methods: This paper maps the evolution of statistical methods used in medical research based on 4,919 relevant publications retrieved from the Web of Science.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.

Mov Disord Clin Pract

September 2025

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Background: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is the most used outcome measure in clinical trials for cerebellar ataxias. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), a parameter used to assess meaningful change, is not clearly defined.

Objective: To help define MCID for SARA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Urinary calculi are characterized by a high recurrence rate, and patients' adherence to self-management after discharge directly affects health outcomes. Traditional offline follow-up models often face problems such as poor compliance and uneven allocation of medical resources, making it difficult to meet individualized health management needs. Remote follow-up provides a novel solution to optimize long-term management, improve health literacy, and enhance clinical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes between women who are English proficient (EP) and those who have limited English proficiency (LEP).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single US academic medical centre with interpreter services.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF