A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Mechanical Performance Evaluation of Negative-Poisson's-Ratio Honeycomb Helmets in Craniocerebral Injury Protection. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Helmets are crucial for protecting motorcycle riders from head injuries in accidents. This study proposes a helmet pad design based on a negative-Poisson's-ratio (NPR) structure and comprehensively evaluates its protective effect on head injuries. A concave hexagonal honeycomb structure was embedded into the energy-absorbing lining of a motorcycle helmet, and finite element collision simulations were conducted according to the ECE R22.05 standard. These simulations compared and analyzed the differences in protective performance between concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets with different parameter configurations and traditional expanded polystyrene (EPS) helmets under flat anvil impact scenarios. Using biomechanical parameters, including peak linear acceleration (PLA), head injury criterion (HIC), intracranial pressure (ICP), maximum principal strain (MPS), and the probability of AIS2+ traumatic brain injury, the protective effect of the helmets on traumatic brain injury was evaluated. The results showed that when the wall angle of the honeycomb structure was 60°, honeycomb helmets with wall thicknesses of 0.8 mm and 1.0 mm significantly reduced PLA and HIC values. In particular, the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.0 mm reduced ICP by 25.7%, while the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.2 mm exhibited the lowest maximum principal strain in the skull compared to EPS helmets and reduced the probability of AIS2+ brain injury by 7.2%. Concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets demonstrated an excellent protective performance in reducing the risk of traumatic brain injury. These findings provide important theoretical foundations and engineering references for the design and optimization of new protective helmets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113351PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma18102188DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

honeycomb helmets
16
brain injury
16
concave hexagonal
12
hexagonal honeycomb
12
traumatic brain
12
helmets
9
honeycomb
8
head injuries
8
honeycomb structure
8
protective performance
8

Similar Publications