Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Helmets are crucial for protecting motorcycle riders from head injuries in accidents. This study proposes a helmet pad design based on a negative-Poisson's-ratio (NPR) structure and comprehensively evaluates its protective effect on head injuries. A concave hexagonal honeycomb structure was embedded into the energy-absorbing lining of a motorcycle helmet, and finite element collision simulations were conducted according to the ECE R22.05 standard. These simulations compared and analyzed the differences in protective performance between concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets with different parameter configurations and traditional expanded polystyrene (EPS) helmets under flat anvil impact scenarios. Using biomechanical parameters, including peak linear acceleration (PLA), head injury criterion (HIC), intracranial pressure (ICP), maximum principal strain (MPS), and the probability of AIS2+ traumatic brain injury, the protective effect of the helmets on traumatic brain injury was evaluated. The results showed that when the wall angle of the honeycomb structure was 60°, honeycomb helmets with wall thicknesses of 0.8 mm and 1.0 mm significantly reduced PLA and HIC values. In particular, the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.0 mm reduced ICP by 25.7%, while the honeycomb helmet with a wall thickness of 1.2 mm exhibited the lowest maximum principal strain in the skull compared to EPS helmets and reduced the probability of AIS2+ brain injury by 7.2%. Concave hexagonal honeycomb helmets demonstrated an excellent protective performance in reducing the risk of traumatic brain injury. These findings provide important theoretical foundations and engineering references for the design and optimization of new protective helmets.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12113351 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma18102188 | DOI Listing |