98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Aims: Chemotherapy treatments induce loss of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue each of which are important prognostic indicators after a cancer diagnosis. Males and females may respond differently to drugs used to treat cancer. Given the high degree of heterogeneity in the literature, the objective of this scoping review is to evaluate the methodological variability in reporting of muscle and adipose tissue changes comparing males and females during cancer-directed treatment.
Methods: Relevant databases were searched for papers reporting longitudinal CT based body composition changes separately for males and females in solid tumors.
Results: Of the 29 studies that met inclusion criteria, 22 were retrospective and 7 were prospective. The majority of studies reported on gastrointestinal cancers [n=24]. Among collective participants (n= 5139), 32% were females. Females were under represented in half the studies. For 21/29 studies, baseline characteristics were combined for males and females, hindering the ability to understand the effect of disease stage, chemotherapy type and co-morbidities on muscle and fat changes experienced by each sex. Multiple chemotherapy regimens were combined (n=24) and not reported in a sex-specific way (n=26).
Conclusion: While the literature reporting body composition changes during cancer treatment is abundant, study design and reporting is problematic and precludes metaanalysis. Disproportionate numbers of males and females, marked heterogeneity in cancer types and chemotherapy regimens evaluated within a single study collectively pose challenges in analysing the impact of specific chemotherapy regimens on muscle and adipose change by sex. Strategies to standardize this set of literature in a sex specific way are required to improve evidence synthesis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.169 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Psychiatry
September 2025
School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Importance: Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug, with 10% to 30% of regular users developing cannabis use disorder (CUD), a condition linked to altered hippocampal integrity. Evidence suggests high-intensity interval training (HIIT) enhances hippocampal structure and function, with this form of physical exercise potentially mitigating CUD-related cognitive and mental health impairments.
Objective: To determine the impact of a 12-week HIIT intervention on hippocampal integrity (ie, structure, connectivity, biochemistry) compared with 12 weeks of strength and resistance (SR) training in CUD.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Oncostat U1018, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Importance: Antibiotics, steroids, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are suspected to decrease the efficacy of immunotherapy.
Objective: To explore the association of comedications with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Design, Setting, And Participants: This nationwide retrospective cohort study used target trial emulations of patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2022, identified from the French national health care database.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Importance: The efficacy of home end-of-life care in enhancing the quality of life for terminally ill patients and families has been well documented. While previous studies have explored perspectives on quality home palliative care and end-of-life care in several countries, limited knowledge exists regarding its specific components in the Chinese context.
Objective: To explore the core elements that constitute quality home end-of-life care in China.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Research in behavioral economics has demonstrated that people have irrational biases, which make them susceptible to decisional shortcuts, or heuristics. The extent to which physicians consciously might use nudges to exploit these heuristics and thereby influence their patients' decision-making is unclear. In addition, ethical questions about the conscious use of nudges in medicine persist, yet little is known about how physicians experience and perceive their use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF