98%
921
2 minutes
20
The technique of implant immediate breast reconstruction has been revived since the advent of acellular dermal matrices (ADM). The traditional technique involving sub-pectoral implant placement is being replaced by the re-emerging technique of muscle-sparing pre-pectoral implant placement due to the availability of ADM, which can wrapped around the implant, thereby obviating the need for any additional tissue cover. Braxon® (DECO Med s.r.l., Marcon, Italy), a novel ADM, specifically designed for breast reconstruction, is gaining popularity among surgeons in the UK and Europe. Its early outcomes seem promising; however, the literature to back its utility is still scarce. Hence, there is a need to gather and compile the existing evidence to inform the current clinical practice. A systematic review was carried out for all the original studies reporting the outcomes of pre-pectoral implant breast reconstruction with Braxon® through MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. Studies were selected and analyzed based on their level of evidence, inclusion and exclusion criteria for pre-pectoral implant breast reconstruction, and outcomes in terms of complication rates and cosmesis. Six studies (742 breast reconstructions in 600 patients) were identified for the review. All of the studies were level IV evidence case series, reporting outcomes for at least three months post-operative follow-up. All except one study mentioned patient selection criteria based on Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) guidelines. Pooled complication rates showed that total 209 (28.2%) breast reconstructions had some form of complication; major complication rate of 98 (13.2%), return to theater 90 (12.1%), implant loss 48 (6.5%), minor complications 111 (15%), seroma 74 (10%), hematoma 29 (3.9%), Red breast syndrome 38 (5.1%), infection 26 (3.5%), necrosis 26 (3.5%), and wound dehiscence 24(3.2%). The short-term pooled complication rates of pre-pectoral implant breast reconstruction with Braxon® are low and comparable with those of the sub-pectoral technique. Although preliminary data are promising; however, the long-term outcomes are yet to be analyzed in future studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843518 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77810 | DOI Listing |
Aesthet Surg J
September 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Background: Patient electronic communication (PEC) via secure messaging is important for patient engagement. While PEC has been studied in primary care, data on surgical specialties, particularly plastic surgery, remain limited.
Objectives: This study assessed the volume and content of post-discharge PECs among patients undergoing post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction.
Aesthet Surg J
September 2025
Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Background: Total mastectomy for breast cancer is an impactful procedure, and breast reconstruction plays a crucial role for women diagnosed with the disease.
Objectives: The objective of our study is to compare satisfaction, morbidity, and timelines of two breast reconstruction techniques after breast cancer: breast prosthesis and exclusive lipofilling.
Methods: This is a comparative, retrospective, unicentric study on patients who underwent total mastectomy between May 2014 and May 2020.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
September 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
J Robot Surg
September 2025
Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China.
Endoscopic breast surgery (EBS) is designed to reduce surgical trauma and optimize cosmetic outcomes through inconspicuous incisions. However, a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of research focus in EBS is lacking. This study aimed to analyze global publication trends, academic impacts, and evolving research directions in the field of EBS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Plast Surg
September 2025
From the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center-College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN.
Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy remains one of the most frequently used methods of breast reconstruction in the US. Patients with large, ptotic breasts often face poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction with auto-augmentation techniques can minimize problems with acellular dermal matrices (ADM) by using less, and providing the benefit of prepectoral placement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF