Ilizarov method combined with accordion technique for treating long bone defects in the lower limbs: a systematic review.

Background: Bone defects and nonunion following initial treatment remain significant clinical challenges. The Ilizarov method constitutes a fundamental approach for addressing bone defects, and its integration with adjunctive techniques, such as the accordion maneuver, antibiotic spacers, or internal fixation, has become increasingly widespread. Despite this, limited research exists on the clinical outcomes specifically related to the use of the Ilizarov method combined with the accordion technique for treating long bone defects in the lower limbs.

Objective: This study seeks to systematically review the application of the Ilizarov method in combination with the accordion technique for addressing long bone deficiencies in the lower limbs.

Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A systematic review was performed in alignment with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), involving searches of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with the search process concluding on August 20, 2024. The study population consisted of patients with bone defects who underwent treatment using the Ilizarov method in conjunction with the accordion technique. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) scoring system. This study recorded and analyzed the participant count for each study that met the inclusion criteria, along with the number of patients who achieved bone healing, the bone and functional outcomes, and complications such as pin infections, pain, and refracture.

Results: Drawing from eight studies involving 80 patients with bone defects treated through the Ilizarov method combined with the accordion technique, this systematic review evaluated the method's impact on bone regeneration. Of these patients, 24% presented with femoral defects, while 76% had tibial defects. The mean patient age was 32.8 years, with an average follow-up of 25.2 months. The accordion technique involved daily distraction and compression adjustments ranging from 0.25 to 1 mm, typically in more than two cycles, effectively promoting bone healing. The bone healing rate was high, with the majority of patients rated as having excellent or good functional recovery, according to standards such as ASAMI and Paley. Common complications included superficial pin tract infections (33.75%) and deep pin tract infections (6.25%), both of which were generally manageable with routine treatment. The accordion technique showed promising results in shortening healing time and enhancing the quality of bone healing.

Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that despite variations in parameter settings across studies, the Ilizarov method combined with the accordion technique consistently shows strong efficacy and safety in promoting bone regeneration and functional recovery. While some complications may arise, they are generally well-managed with standard care. This approach represents a reliable option for complex bone reconstruction, with future research needed to optimize parameters and further enhance clinical outcomes.