Article Synopsis

  • CME is increasingly used for right-sided colon cancer treatment, but there's no strong evidence proving it offers better long-term survival compared to D2 dissection.
  • This multicenter trial involved over 1,000 patients with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer, comparing outcomes between CME and D2 dissection.
  • The results showed no significant differences in 3-year disease-free survival or overall survival rates between the two methods, suggesting that D2 dissection should remain the standard approach unless lymph node involvement is apparent.

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that CME provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by CME.

Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02619942) was performed across 17 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with stage T2-T4aNanyM0 or TanyN + M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. The primary outcome was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS).

Results: Between January 11, 2016, and December 26, 2019, 1,072 patients were randomly assigned (536 patients to CME and 536 patients to D2 dissection). In total, 995 patients (median age 61 years, 59% male) were included in the primary analysis (CME [n = 495] D2 dissection [n = 500]). No significant differences were found between the groups in 3-year DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.02]; = .06; 86.1% in the CME group 81.9% in the D2 group) or in 3-year OS (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.16]; = .17; 94.7% in the CME group 92.6% in the D2 group).

Conclusion: This trial failed to find evidence of superior DFS outcome for CME compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. CME should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00393DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

right-sided colon
16
colon cancer
16
lymph node
12
cme
9
node dissection
8
randomly assigned
8
outcome 3-year
8
536 patients
8
patients cme
8
cme group
8

Similar Publications

Aim And Background: This study investigates the impact of D3 lymph node dissection extent on postoperative bowel function and nutritional status in patients undergoing radical surgery for right-sided colon cancer. Given that postoperative diarrhea can significantly affect the quality of life, we examined whether dissection boundaries influence these outcomes.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a high-volume tertiary hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The clinical characteristics of colonic diverticular perforation are poorly understood. We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of colonic diverticular perforation.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for colonic diverticular perforation from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To compare doses deposited to the liver during right breast radiotherapy with static and dynamic radiotherapy techniques. The second aim was to introduce the liver load index (LLI), a novel index developed to estimate radiation exposure to the liver prior to treatment selection.

Materials And Methods: We prepared radiotherapy treatment plans for ten patients with right breast cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anatomical location of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive stool tests (mt-sDNA or FIT): Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Gastrointest Endosc

September 2025

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; NH Colonoscopy Registry, Lebanon, NH.

Background And Aims: Data comparing the location of polyp yield in patients with positive stool tests can aid screening test selection. We conducted a cross sectional analysis of New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry data to compare the location, left versus right side of the colon, of neoplasia detected on colonoscopy following a mt-sDNA+ or FIT+ test as compared to a reference group having colonoscopy without a stool test.

Methods: Our outcomes were advanced lesions (adenoma and/or serrated polyp, including cancer), advanced adenomas (AA), or advanced serrated polyps (ASP), stratified by location.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery offers significant advantages, including smaller incisions, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter recovery, especially in surgeries requiring access to multiple abdominal quadrants. However, robot-assisted resection of synchronous colorectal cancer (sCRC) remains technically challenging and unstandardized due to its rarity. Herein, we propose an N-shaped configuration of five-trocar placement for the simultaneous right- and left-sided colectomies with intracorporeal anastomosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF