98%
921
2 minutes
20
Genome editing tools, particularly the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) systems (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9), and their repurposing into epigenetic editing platforms, offer enormous potential as safe and customizable therapies for cancer. Specifically, various transcriptional abnormalities in human malignancies, such as silencing of tumor suppressors and ectopic re-expression of oncogenes, have been successfully targeted with virtually no off-target effects using CRISPR activation and repression systems. In these systems, the nuclease-deactivated Cas9 protein (dCas9) is fused to one or more domains inducing selective activation or repression of the targeted genes. Despite these advances, the efficient in vivo delivery of these molecules into the target cancer cells represents a critical barrier to accomplishing translation into a clinical therapy setting for cancer. Major obstacles include the large size of dCas9 fusion proteins, the necessity of multimodal delivery of protein and gRNAs, and the potential of these formulations to elicit detrimental immune responses.In this context, viral methods for delivering CRISPR face several limitations, such as the packaging capacity of the viral genome, the potential for integration of the nucleic acids into the host cells genome, and immunogenicity of viral proteins, posing serious safety concerns. The rapid development of mRNA vaccines in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has rekindled interest in mRNA-based approaches for CRISPR/dCas9 delivery. Simultaneously, due to their high loading capacity, scalability, customizable surface modification for cell targeting, and low immunogenicity, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have been widely explored as nonviral vectors. In this chapter, we first describe the design of optimized dCas9-effector mRNAs and gRNAs for epigenetic editing. We outline formulations of LNPs suitable for dCas9 mRNA delivery. Additionally, we provide a protocol for the co-encapsulation of the dCas9-effector mRNAs and gRNA into these LNPs, along with detailed methods for delivering these formulations to both cell lines (in vitro) and mouse models of breast cancer (in vivo).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4051-7_14 | DOI Listing |
Trends Plant Sci
September 2025
School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia, 4072. Electronic address:
Advances in genome engineering have paved the way for targeted epigenome engineering, providing fundamental insights into the role of epigenetic modifications in trait inheritance. Engineered epialleles have already delivered stable, heritable changes in agronomic traits. Despite this capacity, progress in the field has not yet achieved its potential, leaving many avenues of research unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Rep Med
August 2025
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address:
Despite the clinical use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies (AVAs) in cancer therapy, resistance frequently develops, leading to disease progression. To address this, we identify a previously unknown role for breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1)-associated RING domain 1 (BARD1) in modulating AVA sensitivity. Epigenetic modulation-via global and targeted DNA methylation-reveals BARD1 as a key regulator of angiogenesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAging increases the global burden of disease, yet its molecular basis remains incompletely understood. Recent studies indicate that reversible epigenetic drift-spanning DNA methylation clocks, histone codes, three-dimensional chromatin, and noncoding RNA networks-constitutes a central regulator of organismal decline and age-related diseases. How these epigenetic layers interact across different tissues-and how best to translate them into therapeutic strategies-are still open questions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Cell Biol
September 2025
Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for the Biology of Stem Cells, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. Electronic address: alish
Stem cell-based embryo models provide an alternative system to study an elusive period of development. Programmed mouse embryo models have recently been generated by activating two endogenous regulatory elements via epigenome editing. In this forum article, we discuss this achievement along with the potential of translating it to engineering models of human embryogenesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCrit Rev Oncol Hematol
September 2025
Student Research Committee, Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.. Electronic address:
Epigenetic regulation is fundamental to hematopoiesis, influencing stem cell fate, lineage commitment, and the development of hematologic diseases. Recent technological innovations have transitioned from traditional genetic editing towards programmable, reversible epigenetic modulation without altering the DNA sequence. This review explores the evolution of epigenetic editing platforms, from zinc finger proteins and TALEs to the transformative CRISPR-dCas9 system, and introduces next-generation technologies leveraging dCas12, dCas13, and modular RNA-guided systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF