98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: In February, the emergence of COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID - 19) in France made it necessary to rapidly adapt emergency and SAMU services in order to take care of many infected patients. To respond to the increase in the number of calls in the dispatch centers, reinforcements were necessary on the fronts of the Medical Regulation Assistants (ARM). The aim of this study was to assess the relevance of medical students' responses to first calls exclusively concerning COVID-19.
Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study was carried out at the University Hospital Centre (CHU) in Angers. Twenty medical students mostly in the 5th year were voluntarily enrolled in the first line COVID-19 call taker team. Calls on the 1st, 3, and 5th starting day for each medical student, and randomly selected calls from the experienced first-line call taker were listened to by a medical expert to assess the adequate level of prioritization and orientation (emergency physician or general practitioner). The percentage of agreement between the expert, students, and experienced first-line call handlers were assessed. All participants gave their free consent to participate. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Angers (N° 2020-48).
Results: From March 18 to April 23, 2020, 302 calls from medical students (n = 20 students) and 40 calls from experienced first-line call handlers were analyzed. The average prioritization agreement rate between the expert and students was 76.16% (95% Confidence Interval: 71.04 to 80.62%) (n = 230/302) compared to 87.50% (95% CI: 73.9 to 94.5%) (n = 45/50) for the experienced first-line call handlers = 0.15). Medical students took more time per call with an absolute difference of 2 minutes 16 seconds < 0.001).
Conclusion: The lessons to be observed from this COVID-19 crisis are that in the early days of increasing calls heralding a strain on the healthcare system, support by medical students must be considered.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.15 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med Educ
September 2025
Medical Didactics and Education Research, DEMEDA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
BMC Med Educ
September 2025
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Background: Health professions students may encounter a range of stressors during their clinical education that may impact their quality of life. This study aimed to explore how various health professions students perceive their quality of life and the environment in which they develop their clinical skills.
Methods: An online survey was administered among registered undergraduate students in the physiotherapy, speech-language pathology, nursing, or medical programs.
BMC Nurs
September 2025
International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Background: Postgraduate education is embracing journal clubs (JCs), which provide a platform for members to critically evaluate research articles and extract evidence-based nursing practice. The implementation of JCs by postgraduate nurses, especially in varied educational contexts such as Egypt, remains underexplored. This study aimed to explore and gain valuable insights into the professional experiences of implementing JCs among postgraduate nursing students in Egypt.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi
September 2025
Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Science, Kyoto University of Medical Science.
Purpose: Ensuring that patients undergo examinations with confidence and ease is crucial. This study aims to develop a reliable and valid CT Scan Attitude Scale (CT-SAS) to measure attitudes toward CT scans objectively.
Methods: In Study 1, question items were developed based on preliminary surveys and prior research.
Med Humanit
September 2025
Faculty of Health, York University, Keele Campus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The arts and humanities can direct attention to the health-threatening effects of adverse living and working conditions and the political and economic systems that spawn them. Most of these efforts aim to improve healthcare by promoting empathy and sensitivity among health professionals towards patients and improving clinical skills. However, less effort is devoted towards improving living and working conditions-the structural and social determinants of health-that cause illness and make managing illness difficult.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF