98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Ensuring that patients undergo examinations with confidence and ease is crucial. This study aims to develop a reliable and valid CT Scan Attitude Scale (CT-SAS) to measure attitudes toward CT scans objectively.
Methods: In Study 1, question items were developed based on preliminary surveys and prior research. A survey involving 497 screening participants was conducted to refine the scale. Factor analysis was employed to select appropriate items, estimate a factor model, and assess the reliability of the scale. In Study 2, the CT-SAS was administered to 496 university students, and its validity was evaluated by comparing their responses with those of screening participants.
Results: Study 1 resulted in the development of a 10-item, 3-factor scale, with all model fit indices meeting established criteria. Reliability coefficients (Cronbach's α) for each factor ranged from 0.850 to 0.751, indicating high internal consistency. In Study 2, university students demonstrated significantly higher scores on each factor, supporting the scale's validity.
Conclusion: This study successfully developed and validated the CT Scan Attitude Scale, a tool for assessing attitudes toward CT scans. Future research should explore how interventions targeting examination attitudes can influence outcomes using this scale.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1575 | DOI Listing |
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi
September 2025
Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Science, Kyoto University of Medical Science.
Purpose: Ensuring that patients undergo examinations with confidence and ease is crucial. This study aims to develop a reliable and valid CT Scan Attitude Scale (CT-SAS) to measure attitudes toward CT scans objectively.
Methods: In Study 1, question items were developed based on preliminary surveys and prior research.
Adapt Phys Activ Q
September 2025
Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Many qualified exercise professionals are underprepared to support the quality exercise experiences of persons with disabilities. Community-based exercise programs for persons with disabilities often offer new providers (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer
September 2025
Patient Support Department, American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shared decision making is recommended for lung cancer screening (LCS) by professional organizations and payers. Patient decision aids can be used to support shared decision making, but they need to meet quality standards to minimize the potential for biased and poorly informed patient decisions. After the updated LCS recommendation from the US Preventive Services Task Force in 2021, the authors conducted an environmental scan of public-facing patient educational materials and evaluated them against criteria from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards for high-quality patient decision aids.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSoc Cogn Affect Neurosci
August 2025
Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Affective touch, involving touch-sensitive C-tactile (CT) afferent nerve fibres, is integral to human development and wellbeing. Despite presumed cultural differences, affective touch research typically includes 'Western', minority-world contexts, with findings extrapolated cross-culturally. We report the first cross-cultural study to experimentally investigate subjective and neurophysiological correlates of affective touch in women in South Africa (SA) and the United Kingdom (UK) using (1) touch ratings, and (2) cortical oscillations for slow CT-optimal (vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
August 2025
Johns Hopkins Research Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of integrating point-of-care ultrasound scan (POCUS) by midwives into routine antenatal care (ANC) services.
Design: Prospective, observational, multiphase, implementation science study.
Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes included the proportion of midwives who completed training and competency checks for basic obstetric scanning using a POCUS device; the feasibility and acceptability of midwife-delivered POCUS from the perspectives of midwives and pregnant women captured on structured questionnaires; and the proportion of scans meeting predefined quality standards.