98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Neurological disease is a known entity for causing erectile dysfunction (ED). Pharmacological therapies are not always effective these patients - penile prosthesis implant (PPI) is an established surgical treatment option. For a variety of reasons, neurological patients may experience differing outcomes of PPI compared to those whose ED arises from other causes. We investigated outcomes of PPI in neurological patients using the Italian multi-institutional national registry of penile prostheses [Italian Nationwide Systematic Inventarization of Surgical Treatment for ED (INSIST-ED)].
Methods: Patients undergoing PPI were investigated the INSIST-ED registry, from 2014 to 2021. Data were prospectively recorded by 45 surgeons on a dedicated website (www.registro.andrologiaitaliana.it) and reviewed by a data manager. We subselected patients with neurological disease undergoing PPI for ED, and these patients were reviewed at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Postoperative complications and functional outcomes were evaluated through validated questionnaires [International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), Sexual Encounter Profile 2-3, and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS)]. A nonvalidated questionnaire was administered to assess patient satisfaction.
Results: A total of 33 patients were included with a median age of 49 [interquartile range (IQR) 41-55]. Median follow-up was 83 months (IQR 67-99.5). A penoscrotal approach for PPI was performed in most cases (90.9%), while infrapubic was used in three cases (9.1%). Inflatable and malleable devices were implanted in 30 (90.9%) and 3 cases (9.1%), respectively. Intraoperative complications occurred in one case (3%). Early postoperative complications (<90 days) were observed in three cases (9.1%): two wound dehiscence (Clavien-Dindo G1 and G3a respectively) and one device infection requiring prosthesis explant (Clavien-Dindo G3a). Mechanical failures of inflatable devices were not observed during the follow-up period. Median IIEF-5 before surgery was 8 (IQR 7-9). At the latest follow-up, IIEF-5 was 22 (IQR 19-23.5), and median EDITS was 79 (IQR 64-88). A total of 28 patients (84.8%) self-reported to be fully satisfied with the PPI.
Conclusion: Although PPI in the neurological population has been historically considered to be at increased risk, in our study, PPI complications and infections rates in this cohort did not differ from general population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472821 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231194921 | DOI Listing |
BJU Int
September 2025
Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Objectives: To provide a comprehensive summary of the surgical outcomes of Zephyr Surgical Implants (ZSI; Geneva, Switzerland) hydraulic and malleable female-to-male (FTM) penile implants (PIs) in transgender patients.
Patients And Methods: All transgender patients who underwent hydraulic (ZSI FTM 475) and malleable (ZSI FTM 100) erectile device implantation between January 2017 and March 2024 were retrospectively identified. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and re-operations were recorded.
Can Urol Assoc J
August 2025
Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Introduction: Penile prosthesis implantation is a well-established treatment for refractory erectile dysfunction; however, significant variations exist in surgical techniques and practice patterns, often influenced by individual surgeon experience and training. Our study aimed to identify these variations among Canadian implanters, assessing their approach to penile prosthesis surgery.
Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted to evaluate the practice patterns of Canadian surgeons performing penile prosthesis implantation.
Minerva Urol Nephrol
August 2025
Department of Urology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Background: Real life data on adverse events of penile prosthesis are lacking. Aim of this study is to summarize medical device reports (MDRs) related to penile prosthesis implants within the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database held by The Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Methods: We examined all MDRs from MAUDE database reported in the last ten years related to each FDA-approved penile implant.
Front Surg
August 2025
Department of Urology, Gongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China.
Background: Three-piece expandable penile prosthesis implantation is the ultimate means to treat penile erectile dysfunction, and patients can achieve high levels of satisfaction. However, once postprosthetic infection occurs, clinical treatment and care become very challenging. However, the nursing experience about this disease is rare reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrol Ann
July 2025
Department of Urology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aims: The plaque excision and grating technique is indicated for correcting penile curvature in Peyronie's disease. We assessed our experience of the modified split graft technique using bovine pericardium after plaque excision.
Materials And Methods: Between March 2020 and September 2024, we operated on 12 patients by the excision of plaque and split grafting technique.