Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002471 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Rethinking Platforms in ERBB2-Positive Gastric Cancer-Reply.
JAMA Oncol
September 2025
State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Super effect or methodological flaw: questioning the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cancer narrative. Reply to Maier GA, Rathmann W, Kuß O [letter].
Diabetologia
September 2025
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Reply to letter to the editor: "Preliminary analysis of the association between apolipoprotein E genotype, amyloid burden, and cognitive decline in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients".
J Neurol Sci
August 2025
HM CINAC (Centro Integral de Neurociencias Abarca Campal), Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria HM Hospitales, Spain. Electronic address:
Reply to: Germline and Somatic Mutations in Breast Cancer Treatment Strategies.
JCO Precis Oncol
September 2025
Sibylle Loibl, MD, German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Primary author contact for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review.
World J Methodol
September 2025
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) synthesize and evaluate data, mainly from randomized trials, which then guides the development of clinical recommendations in evidence-based medicine. However, the data and methodological information in the included papers can often be lacking or unclear, and reviewers usually need to contact the authors of included studies for clarifications. Contacting authors is recommended, but it is unclear how often SR teams do it, or what the level of response is.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF