Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Background: In CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (2 cycles) significantly improved overall survival versus chemotherapy (4 cycles) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and no known sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase alterations. We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs; minimum follow-up, 2 years).
Methods: In patients (N = 719) randomised 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L). Treatment-phase changes in LCSS average symptom burden index (ASBI), LCSS three-item global index (3-IGI) and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) and utility index (UI) over time were analysed descriptively and using mixed-effect model repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration/improvement analyses were conducted.
Results: Treatment-phase PRO questionnaire completion rates were >80%. Mean treatment-phase changes showed no deterioration from baseline in both arms for LCSS ASBI/3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI; however, minimally important differences were not met. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses showed overall reduction in symptom burden from baseline for both arms; changes from baseline for LCSS 3-IGI and EQ-5D-3L VAS/UI were numerically improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, but minimally important differences were not met. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy delayed time-to-definitive-deterioration versus chemotherapy (LCSS ASBI: hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.87]); results were similar across PRO measures.
Conclusions: At 2-year minimum follow-up, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy reduced the risk of definitive deterioration in disease-related symptom burden and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy and maintained QoL in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03215706.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.015 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Perioperative nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable diffuse pleural mesothelioma: a phase 2 trial and ctDNA analyses.
Nat Med
September 2025
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is standard of care in advanced diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM), but its role in the perioperative management of DPM is unclear. In tandem, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ultra-sensitive residual disease detection has shown promise in providing a molecular readout of ICB efficacy across resectable cancers. This phase 2 trial investigated neoadjuvant nivolumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab in resectable DPM along with tumor-informed liquid biopsy residual disease assessments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEfficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Oncol Res
September 2025
Department of Pathology, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, China.
Objectives: Checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in a number of malignancies. To determine the most effective course of treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), this systematic review evaluated the efficacy of several therapeutic approaches based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Methods: A comprehensive evaluation of the literature was conducted, looking at randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since database establishment.
Predictors of early progressive disease and antitumor effects by metastatic site in renal cell carcinoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.
Int J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan.
Background: Despite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.
Background: Patients with BRAF wild type (wt) metastatic melanoma who exhibit primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) face a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy has been shown to induce genetic mutations, modify the tumor microenvironment and microbiome, and influence immune system activity.
Objectives: This prospective multicenter phase II trial investigates whether two applications of an alkylating agent (dacarbazine/DTIC) can sensitize ICI non-responsive patients with metastatic melanoma to the same checkpoint inhibitor regime.
Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab in older adults with renal cell carcinoma: findings from a multicenter observational study in Poland.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Department of Chemotherapy, The District Hospital, Sucha Beskidzka, Poland.
Background: Nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo+ipi) are recommended for treating metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), though their safety and efficacy in older adults remain uncertain. This study examines the outcomes of this regimen in Polish patients aged ≥65 years.
Methods: In this multicenter observational study, 138 patients with mRCC who received nivo+ipi between May 2022 and October 2024 were analyzed.