Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab has played an important role in the systemic treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without gene mutation. In recent years, bevacizumab biosimilar has received marketing approval based on the results of phase III clinical studies. However, more clinical data are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar in clinical application.

Materials And Methods: We identified 946 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were treated with bevacizumab biosimilar or bevacizumab from January 1, 2019 to November 30, 2021. Comparisons and statistical analyses of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab were made in terms of efficacy and safety. Efficacy evaluation was performed directly in accordance with RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

Results: The objective response rates (ORRs) were 28.9% in the biosimilar group (n=551) and 30.9% in the reference group (n=395; unstratified ORR risk ratio: 0.934, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-1.138; unstratified ORR risk difference: -0.020, 95% CI: -0.118-0.035). The estimated median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 6.27 (95% CI: 5.53-7.01) and 4.93 (95% CI: 4.24-5.62) months in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (=0.296). The number of treatment lines, combined treatment regimens and with or without radiotherapy were significant factors affecting the PFS of both groups (<0.001, =0.001, =0.039). Different genetic mutations and dose intensity were not the main factors affecting PFS (=0.627, =0.946). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 76.41% in the biosimilar group and 71.65% in the reference group (=0.098). The incidences of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 22.14% and 19.49% in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (=0.324).

Conclusions: Bevacizumab biosimilar is equivalent in efficacy to bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC. It showed acceptable toxicity profile and no new adverse events. Patients who were excluded by clinical trials can also benefit from bevacizumab biosimilar.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868544PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1036906DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bevacizumab biosimilar
20
efficacy safety
12
bevacizumab
9
safety bevacizumab
8
locally advanced
8
lung cancer
8
biosimilar bevacizumab
8
adverse events
8
unstratified orr
8
orr risk
8

Similar Publications

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains a cornerstone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) but is limited by tumor progression. Combining TACE with systemic therapies may enhance efficacy. Notably, sintilimab combined with bevacizumab biosimilar has shown synergistic effects in tumor control and has been incorporated into the first-line treatment regimen in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to compare adverse event (AE) profiles between Avastin and bevacizumab biosimilars to support clinical decision-making, given the limited availability of real-world data.

Methods: A disproportionality analysis was conducted using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify and compare AE signals. Signals were evaluated at the system organ classes (SOCs) and preferred term (PT) levels, focusing on the Top 20 PTs by report number, key SOCs and outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Data from the CT-P16 3.1 study demonstrated equivalent efficacy between CT-P16, a bevacizumab biosimilar, and European-approved reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) for the primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) during induction treatment in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We now present long-term findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Advanced and recurrent cervical cancer often requires palliative chemotherapy and is associated with poor prognosis. Recently, various systemic therapies-including cytotoxic drugs, anti-angiogenic agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors-have been evaluated for their cost-effectiveness.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of English language-based research publications reporting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for chemotherapy-based treatments in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to assess the tolerability and efficacy of finotonlimab (an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody) in combination with SCT510, a bevacizumab biosimilar, versus sorafenib in unresectable advanced HCC. This randomized phase 2 and 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04560894; Chinadrugtrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF