98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Robin sequence is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. In up to 85 percent, it is associated with cleft palate. Many studies have reported worse speech development in Robin sequence children after cleft palate repair. The authors investigated speech development in isolated Robin sequence with cleft palate versus children with cleft palate only at the age of 5 to 6 years.
Methods: All Robin sequence children were treated with the Tübingen palatal plate after birth. Data were collected using the German version of the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment. Audio and video recordings were reviewed and analyzed separately by two blinded senior phoniatricians based on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech, and scored to enable comparability of speech outcomes.
Results: Forty-four children (Robin sequence, n = 22; cleft palate only, n = 22) were included. Robin sequence children were significantly older at surgery (11.8 months versus 7.1 months; p < 0.001) but younger at study (70.5 months versus 75.2 months; p = 0.035). They also had more severe cleft of the palate (p = 0.006). All children studied showed good to very good speech development without serious impairment. None of the reported parameters on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech showed significant group differences; the median total score in the Robin sequence group was 23 (interquartile range, 16.5 to 27.5) versus 19 (interquartile range, 17 to 23) in the cleft palate-only group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of group (Z = -1.47; p = 0.14).
Conclusions: No group differences in speech development were found at age 5 to 6 years. Isolated Robin sequence does not necessarily represent a risk for impaired speech development.
Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Risk, II.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008730 | DOI Listing |
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
September 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Neonatal and Pediatric Craniofacial Airway Orthodontics, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 770 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94394, USA.
Background: Alveolar molding plate treatment (AMPT) plays a critical role in preparing neonates with cleft lip and palate (CLP) for the first reconstruction surgery (cleft lip repair). However, determining the number of adjustments to AMPT in near-normalizing cleft deformity prior to surgery is a challenging task, often affecting the treatment duration. This study explores the use of machine learning in predicting treatment duration based on three-dimensional (3D) assessments of the pre-treatment maxillary cleft deformity as part of individualized treatment planning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthod Craniofac Res
September 2025
Georgia School of Orthodontics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Management of class III malocclusion in patients with cleft is geared toward improving the maxillary position with maxillary protraction therapy with or without bone anchorage. This study aims at evaluating the effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and tooth-anchored maxillary protraction (TAMP) appliances in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). A search of PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and ClinicalTrials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
September 2025
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Background: There remains significant uncertainty about the fistula rate following palate repair with the Furlow double opposing Z-plasty (Furlow) technique compared to a straight-line mucosal incision with intravelar veloplasty (straight-line/IVVP) technique. Moreover, the relative impact of technique and surgical skill on fistula incidence remains unclear.
Methods: A prospective, observational study of cleft palate repair was conducted.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
September 2025
School and Hospital of Stomatology, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of zinc concentration on palatal development in fetal mice and its association with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling pathway.MethodsPregnant C57BL/6J mice were fed diets with varying zinc concentrations and randomly divided into a zinc-rich (ZR) group, a normal-zinc (NZ) group, and a zinc-deficient (ZD) group. Embryonic development was observed, and the expression levels of AhR signaling pathway-related factors were examined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHum Mutat
September 2025
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Over the past decade, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have found genetic variants associated with elevated risk for nonsyndromic orofacial cleft (NSOFC). In the post-GWAS era of NSOFC genetic research, an important aim is to identify the pathogenic variants that influence craniofacial development processes, towards understanding how they lead to disease manifestation. However, two major challenges hinder the translation of GWAS results into a mechanistic understanding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF