Peripheral blood indices to predict PFS/OS with anlotinib as a subsequent treatment in advanced small-cell lung cancer.

Cancer Biol Med

Department of Thoracic Oncology Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.

Published: July 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: In the phase II ALTER-1202 (NCT03059797) trial, anlotinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who underwent at least 2 previous chemotherapy cycles, when compared with a placebo group. To identify potential factors for predicting efficacy and prognosis with anlotinib treatment, we analyzed hematological indices at baseline and adverse events (AEs) over the course of anlotinib treatment.

Methods: Data were collected from March 2017 to April 2019 from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II trial of anlotinib. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive anlotinib or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The patients received anlotinib (12 mg) or an analogue capsule (placebo) orally once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. The hematological indices at baseline and AEs that occurred in the initial 2 treatment cycles were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier test and Cox regression model were used to assess survival differences.

Results: A total of 82 patients (81 patients with complete data) were randomly assigned to receive anlotinib, with 38 receiving a placebo as a control. Multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio > 7.75 and lactate dehydrogenase > 254.65 U/L at baseline were independent risk factors for PFS; basal elevated aspartate aminotransferase > 26.75 U/L, neuron specific enolase > 18.64 ng/mL, and fibrinogen > 4.645 g/L were independent risk factors for OS. During treatment, elevated γ glutamyltransferase and hypophosphatemia were independent predictors for a poor PFS, and elevated γ-glutamyl transferase and hypercholesterolemia were independent factors for OS.

Conclusions: Our study preliminarily defined potential factors that affected the PFS and OS at baseline and during anlotinib treatment in patients with advanced SCLC. Our findings provide a basis for screening the dominant population and for dynamic efficacy monitoring with anlotinib therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425186PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0727DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anlotinib
10
advanced small-cell
8
small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
trial anlotinib
8
patients advanced
8
potential factors
8
anlotinib treatment
8
hematological indices
8
indices baseline
8

Similar Publications

Background And Objective: Radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) remains challenging to treat due to a lack of effective therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib with iodine-125 (I) seed implantation in patients with RAIR-DTC.

Methods And Materials: We retrospectively compared three treatment groups in 52 patients with advanced RAIR-DTC: anlotinib monotherapy (Group A, = 14), I seed brachytherapy monotherapy (Group B, = 25), and combined therapy (Group C, = 13).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib-related therapeutic regimens in patients with previously immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: A total of 107 patients with previously ICIs-treated advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib-related regimens or single-agent chemotherapy in clinical practice were included in this study retrospectively. The anlotinib group (AG) included 54 patients who received anlotinib-related regimens, and the chemotherapy group (CG) consisted of 53 patients who received single-agent chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have markedly improved first-line management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many tumors eventually escape control after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, leaving a clear therapeutic gap. Preclinical studies and preliminary clinical data suggest that coupling ICIs with anti-angiogenesis therapy can yield complementary antitumor effects. Consequently, we launched this investigation to evaluate the therapeutic benefit and tolerability of sintilimab, a PD-(L)1-blocking monoclonal antibody, together with the oral multi-target anti-angiogenesis agent anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC individuals experiencing progression after first-line PD-(L)1 inhibition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

First-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (ETER100): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol

September 2025

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Background: The underexplored potential of PD-L1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma highlights an urgent need for novel agents. This trial aimed to compare benmelstobart (a novel PD-L1 inhibitor) plus anlotinib with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Methods: ETER100 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 37 medical sites in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade is a growing treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC) compared versus anlotinib plus EC and EC alone for patients with ES-SCLC in China.

Methods: Using a Markov model over 5-year boundary and data from the ETER701 trials, we analyzed quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), total cost, incremental net health benefit (INHB) and incremental monetary benefit (INMB).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF