Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To study the efficacy of capecitabine or S-1 plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX or SOX) for treating thymidine phosphorylase (TP)- or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Materials And Methods: Eighty-six patients with stage IIIC to IV gastric cancer were assessed for TP and DPD expression by immunohistochemistry. The association between CAPOX or SOX efficacy and TP/DPD expression was retrospectively analyzed.

Results: There were no significant differences in the objective remission rate (ORR, 52.27% vs. 47.62%; P>0.05), disease control rate (72.73% vs. 73.81%, P>0.05), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.739-1.741; P=0.586), and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.481-1.511; P=0.588) between CAPOX and SOX. A higher number of stage IV patients showed TP positivity, while DPD-positive patients predominantly showed intestinal type of gastric cancer. In TP-positive patients, the ORRs associated with CAPOX and SOX treatments were 57.14% and 38.10%, respectively; OS was better with CAPOX than with SOX (HR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.179-0.978; P=0.046). Among DPD-positive patients, the SOX treatment-associated ORR (60.87%) was significantly higher than the CAPOX treatment-associated ORR (43.48%). Furthermore, SOX treatment resulted in better OS than did CAPOX treatment (HR, 2.020; 95% CI, 1.019-4.837; P=0.049).

Conclusions: No significant difference in clinical efficacy was found between CAPOX and SOX. TP-positive patients might respond better to CAPOX while DPD-positive patients may respond better to SOX. Our findings might serve as a guide for personalized chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928084PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e40DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

capox sox
24
gastric cancer
16
dpd-positive patients
12
better capox
12
capox
9
sox
9
thymidine phosphorylase
8
dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
8
patients
8
advanced gastric
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: We report the safety and efficacy of nivolumab + chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in the Korean subpopulation of the ATTRACTION-4 clinical trial.

Materials And Methods: ATTRACTION-4 (NCT02746796) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of patients aged ≥20 years with histologically confirmed unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients received nivolumab or placebo, both combined with physician-choice chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 [tegafur‒gimeracil‒oteracil] [SOX] or oral capecitabine [CAPOX]).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A significant number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) benefit from adjuvant therapy. While 6 months of FOLFOX is standard of care, newer regimens like CAPOX and SOX allow for shorter durations. Trials of importance include SCOT (U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The multicentre RESOLVE trial examined the efficacy of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Initial analyses did not encompass overall survival owing to the immature data. This paper provides an updated analysis of the survival data from the RESOLVE trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer, with a focus on understanding its long-term effects through clinical trials.
  • In the ATTRACTON-4 trial, conducted across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, patients were assigned to either nivolumab or a placebo alongside common chemotherapy regimens, with the primary goals being progression-free survival and overall survival.
  • After three years, the nivolumab group showed longer progression-free survival but similar overall survival compared to the placebo group, with a significant majority of patients who responded completely to treatment remaining alive, indicating its effective and safe use in this setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF