98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To evaluate whether maternal intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) affects medically assisted reproduction outcomes (MAR).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Settings: Fertility centre at an academic hospital.
Population: This study includes 612 women who underwent 1572 MAR cycles, including 804 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles and 768 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles.
Methods: A 131-item food frequency questionnaire assessed women's pretreatment SSB and ASB intake.
Main Outcome Measures: Live birth per treatment cycle was considered the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included estradiol trigger levels, endometrial thickness, total oocyte yield, fertilisation, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and pregnancy loss probabilities.
Results: A total of 112 (18.3%) women did not consume SSB, and 171 (27.9%) did not consume ASB. SSB and ASB intake were unrelated to the likelihood of success in infertility treatment cycles. The adjusted predicted marginal probability (95% CI) of live birth among women in the lowest and highest category of intake of SSBs was 0.41 (0.32, 0.50) and 0.41 (0.34, 0.49) in couples undergoing IVF/ICSI and 0.10 (0.06, 0.17) and 0.11 (0.07, 0.17) in couples undergoing IUI. The corresponding results for the lowest and highest categories of intake of ASB and live birth were 0.40 (0.33, 0.48) and 0.41 (0.33, 0.49) for IVF/ICSI cycles and 0.09 (0.06, 0.15) and 0.08 (0.05, 0.13) for IUI cycles. There were inconsistent associations in secondary analyses focused on intakes of individual beverages.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in couples seeking MAR, women's intake of SSB or ASB is unrelated to the likelihood of success in infertility treatment with IUI or IVF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18360 | DOI Listing |
BJOG
September 2025
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective: To evaluate whether maternal intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) affects medically assisted reproduction outcomes (MAR).
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Settings: Fertility centre at an academic hospital.
Nutr J
July 2025
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, The Catholic University of Korea, 43 Jibong-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon-si, 14662, Geonggi-do, Korea, Republic of.
Background: While artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) are widely reported to have minimal glycemic impact compared to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), their effects in mixed meal conditions and individual variability in response remain poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate postprandial glycemic response (PPGR) and individual variability in response to an SSB (regular cola) and an ASB (zero cola), both in single and mixed conditions, using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
Methods: A total of 66 healthy young adults participated in this 14-day, non-randomized crossover intervention study.
JAMA Psychiatry
August 2025
School of Public Health, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Importance: Intake of sweetened beverages, including sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and artificially sweetened beverages (ASB), has been linked to multiple health outcomes, but their associations with dementia risk among older adults are unclear.
Objective: To assess whether the consumption of SSB and ASB is associated with the risk of all-cause dementia in older adults.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This multicohort study examined data from US adults aged 65 and older enrolled in the Health and Retirement Study (2013), the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (1987-1995), the Chicago Healthy and Aging Project (1993-2012), the Rush Memory and Aging Project (1997-2005), the Framingham Heart Study original cohort (1986-1994), and its offspring cohort (1991-2001).
Aging Ment Health
June 2025
Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Objectives: This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse prospective cohort studies to evaluate the association between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), and soft drinks with the risk of AD.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to September 2024 to identify observational studies reporting on the association between sweetened beverages and AD risk. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Diabetes Metab
May 2025
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3085, Australia. Electronic address:
Aim: Globally, sugar intake from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) exceeds the daily recommended limits for intake levels of free sugar. Artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), widely used to replace SSBs, are increasingly linked to adverse health outcomes. Hence, we assessed the association of sweetened beverage intake (SSBs and ASBs) with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF