A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Reduced Peak Myocardial Work Efficiency With Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Predicts Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis in Chronic Coronary Syndrome. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Identification of significant coronary artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is crucial for clinical management. Myocardial work (MW) is a new noninvasive method reflecting myocardial metabolism and has been applied in myocardial ischemia. We aimed to explore the value of global MW during vasodilator stress echocardiography in detecting significant CAS.

Methods: Patients with angina or equivalent symptoms underwent coronary angiography and vasodilator stress echocardiography. Significant CAS was defined as ≥70% luminal stenosis in one or more major epicardial vessels or ≥50% in the left main coronary. Global MW was analyzed by speckle-tracking echocardiography with blood pressure. The diagnostic performance of MW parameters in detecting significant CAS was evaluated.

Results: One hundred forty-six patients were enrolled into the study, and 67 patients had significant CAS. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), global longitudinal strain (GLS), global MW index (MWI), and global MW efficiency (MWE) were significantly lower in the significant CAS group than those in the non-significant group both at rest and peak stress (p < 0.001 for CFVR, GLS, MWE; p < 0.01 for MWI). Logistic regression analyses showed that CFVR and peak MWE effectively predicted significant CAS. Peak MWE outperformed other parameters with the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820. Furthermore, the model integrating CFVR and peak MWE (AUC = 0.886) was much better than CFVR or peak MWE alone.

Conclusions: Peak MWE combined with CVFR might be a reliable method of noninvasively screening significant CAS in patients with CCS before invasive angiography.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/echo.70284DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myocardial work
8
coronary
8
coronary flow
8
flow velocity
8
velocity reserve
8
coronary artery
8
artery stenosis
8
chronic coronary
8
vasodilator stress
8
stress echocardiography
8

Similar Publications