Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes for immediate pushing and delayed pushing in the second stage of labor in women receiving epidural analgesia.

Data Sources: Systematic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL without restrictions by language, date of publication, or methodological quality.

Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were based on methodological and clinical factors such as population (pregnant women with epidural analgesia), intervention and control (delayed versus immediate pushing), neonatal outcomes, and study design (systematic reviews).

Data Extraction: The outcome measures were Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admission, prevalence of low umbilical artery cord pH, and umbilical artery cord pH. The methodological quality was analyzed using the Assessing the Methodological Study Tool for Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) scales, and the strength of evidence was established according to the Guidelines Advisory Committee grading criteria. For the umbilical artery cord pH variable, standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model.

Data Synthesis: Seven systematic reviews with meta-analysis were included. The results suggest no difference between groups for Apgar test scores at 5 min, nor in the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Mixed results were found for delayed pushing leading to improvements in Apgar test scores at 1 min. No statistically significant between-group differences in the umbilical artery cord pH were found. The total duration of the second stage in the delayed pushing group was not significantly correlated with the umbilical artery cord pH.

Conclusions: Delayed pushing produces at least the same neonatal outcomes as immediate pushing in healthy pregnant women receiving epidural analgesia with a single fetus in vertex presentation with a limited quality of evidence. Review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42023397616).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08118-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delayed pushing
20
umbilical artery
20
artery cord
20
neonatal outcomes
16
systematic reviews
16
second stage
12
pushing
8
pushing second
8
stage labor
8
outcomes pushing
8

Similar Publications

Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the pancreas is a rare tumor of pancreatic mesenchymal origin with malignant potential. Critical to appropriate clinical management is determining whether the tumor is benign or malignant. Because of its rarity, morphologic and histologic characteristics and limited patient follow-up of pancreatic PEComa have precluded precise definition of malignancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes for immediate pushing and delayed pushing in the second stage of labor in women receiving epidural analgesia.

Data Sources: Systematic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL without restrictions by language, date of publication, or methodological quality.

Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were based on methodological and clinical factors such as population (pregnant women with epidural analgesia), intervention and control (delayed versus immediate pushing), neonatal outcomes, and study design (systematic reviews).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Proton radiation therapy (PRT) and mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors (mIDH-inhibitors) are emerging therapies for mIDH lower grade gliomas (LGGs). Despite their substantial theoretical benefits, comparisons with current standards - particularly pertaining to patient-centred outcomes - are limited.

Methods: Through PubMed and Scopus, a search strategy based on keywords focusing on PRT and mIDH-inhibitors was applied on December 3, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Amblyopia is a common developmental disorder with reduced visual acuity and impairment in binocular functions. Patching the fellow eye, as the gold standard therapy in amblyopia, sometimes fails to achieve satisfactory outcomes because of poor adherence or delayed intervention. Recently, dichoptic/binocular digital therapy in amblyopia has been developed, but no evidence-based binocular treatments with superiority are available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF