Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose:  Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is a complex procedure that may benefit from centralization. We examined the association between annual hospital volume of rTHA and re-revision risk and mortality.

Methods:  We included all rTHAs between 2007 and 2022 in general hospitals, registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI; n = 12,515). Hospitals were categorized into low (< 25 rTHA/year) or high volume (≥ 25 rTHA/year). Competing-risk analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to assess implant re-revision and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for mortality. Results were stratified into septic (permanent Girdlestone, 1-stage, and 2-stage revisions) and aseptic first revisions.

Results:  1-stage septic revisions showed a higher risk of re-revision in high-volume hospitals (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.4). We found no difference in re-revision risk after DAIR (HR 1.1, CI 0.9-1.3). 2-stage septic revisions were more often performed in high-volume hospitals (5% vs 2%). There was no statistical difference in re-revision rates between hospitals after revision for aseptic loosening (HR 1.1, CI 0.9-1.4), dislocation (HR 1.1, CI 0.9-1.4), and periprosthetic fractures (HR 1.1, CI 0.8-1.5). Mortality showed no differences between groups, neither for septic nor aseptic revisions.

Conclusion:  There was no difference between high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals regarding risk for re-revision after aseptic loosening, dislocation and periprosthetic fracture, and septic DAIR and mortality. In high-volume hospitals, 1-stage septic revisions was associated with a significantly higher re-revision risk. 2-stage revisions are more frequent in high-volume hospitals, indicating more complex pathology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357176PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44331DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-volume hospitals
24
re-revision risk
16
septic revisions
12
hospitals
10
low-volume hospitals
8
septic aseptic
8
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
re-revision
8
dutch arthroplasty
8

Similar Publications

Background: Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) is the mainstay for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, the relationship among facility size, risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity in C-MIE remains unclear. This study aims to clarify whether C-MIE should be consolidated into high-volume centers in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Our study represents the first effort in the Eastern Mediterranean Region to identify disparities in the quality of colorectal cancer (CRC) care in Iran.

Methods: We established a collaborative registry program for non-metastatic CRC patients to evaluate survival rates between teaching cancer centers (TCCs) and a high-volume, non-teaching, non-cancer center (NTNC). The study included a diverse patient population and considered various factors such as cancer stage, margin involvement, adherence to guidelines for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments, emergency surgeries, socioeconomic status, and risk of surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) poses a significant global health threat, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are particularly susceptible to AMR due to frequent invasive procedures, extended hospital stays, and the selective pressure exerted by broad-spectrum antibiotics. This review aims to shed light on the current landscape of antibiotic resistance within ICUs of Saudi hospitals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Maternal obesity is a growing global health concern, yet its impact on maternal haemodynamic throughout pregnancy remains underexplored. We investigated haemodynamic adaptations across gestation in women with high body mass index (BMI) (≥35 kg/m) and results were compared to low-risk controls (BMI 18.5-24.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastrointestinal complications following cardiac surgery: A national analysis.

Surgery

September 2025

Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address:

Background: Gastrointestinal complications occur in ∼1 of 20 patients undergoing cardiac surgery and are associated with adverse consequences, although contemporary analyses are lacking.

Methods: All elective adult (≥18) hospitalizations entailing coronary artery bypass grafting, valve procedures, or a combination thereof were identified in the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmission Database. Institutions were stratified by annual hospital cardiac surgery volume, with the highest quartile defined as high-volume hospitals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF