98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: This paper describes the social support women aged 25-35 years living in Victoria, Australia draw on during the reproductive decision-making process specific to the type of support they seek and their satisfaction with that support.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study that collected data through an online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. This included both closed- and open-ended questions, exploring women's experiences of receiving social support for reproductive decision-making, the types of support they sought, and their satisfaction with the support received. Using convenience sampling, we recruited 234 women aged 25-35 years.
Results: The women highlighted a myriad of factors that influenced their experiences of seeking and receiving support (or not), both positively and negatively. These included individual or micro-level factors (e.g., interpersonal relationships); contextual factors (e.g., issue and/or time-dependent); and macro/societal level factors (e.g., social attitudes and norms). The type of support depends on the reproductive decision, with women employing strategies to enhance their satisfaction with support.
Conclusion: These findings are important to inform and advocate for future public health and social policy to support women's decision-making and overall health and wellbeing related to their reproductive autonomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70031 | DOI Listing |
Nurs Health Sci
September 2025
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. We aimed to understand stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving CS in pregnancy care to inform areas for intervention. Stakeholders from five health services participated in three Group Model Building workshops to identify the drivers of CS and intervention opportunities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFam Pract
August 2025
Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, Division of Family and Community Medicine, University of Utah, 310 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Background: Pregnancy care in the USA is in crisis, particularly in rural areas. Shortages and maldistribution of care are contributing factors. Family medicine (FM) physicians could be crucial to addressing the crisis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Genet Couns
October 2025
Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, individuals can seek genetic risk information for multiple conditions. However, feasibility and communication challenges could arise if offering multiple genetic tests simultaneously, such as cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening for pregnancy planning. Genetic screening introduces uncertainty from probabilistic results, ambiguous gene-disease associations, and complex variant interpretation, intertwining with psychosocial concerns impacting decision-making and emotional well-being.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Background: This study investigates the clinical value of a structured team approach incorporating shared decision-making in managing critically ill pregnant patients within an obstetrics intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 critically ill pregnant women admitted to our hospital's obstetrics ICU between January 2023 and December 2024. Participants were allocated via random number table to either the control group receiving conventional multidisciplinary resuscitation care (n = 50) or the observation group receiving the structured team model with shared decision-making (n = 50).
A vast amount of research has shown that social inequality in educational attainment is a persistent phenomenon. Sociological research explains unequal educational decisions via primary and secondary effects of social origin, respectively unequal school performance and patterns of educational decision-making. So far, educational sociology has largely ignored the role of personality traits for educational decision-making.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF