98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Ciprofol, a propofol derivative, is increasingly used for sedation in China. However, the specific benefits of ciprofol in gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation have not been fully evaluated. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol with propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Methods: Four public databases were searched for the relevant literature to 1 February 2025. Studies were excluded based on predefined criteria, and the characteristics and outcome data of each included study were collected. Subsequently, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta, respectively.
Results: Nine studies involving 1860 participants were included in this study. Compared with propofol, ciprofol significantly reduced rates of hypotension (risk ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.89), respiratory depression (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91), hypoxemia (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.87), choking cough (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.95), and injection pain (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22). Awakening time of ciprofol was slightly prolonged (mean difference [MD] 0.81 minutes, 95% CI 0.02-1.61), though not clinically significant. Bradycardia, involuntary movement, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, TSA demonstrated that the results of hypotension, hypoxemia, respiratory depression, and injection pain observed in the current sample size were decisive. Regression analysis did not reveal any potential publication bias.
Conclusions: Ciprofol offers notable advantages over propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation, including a lower incidence of injection pain, hypotension, respiratory depression, and hypoxemia. A dosage of 0.4 mg/kg of ciprofol may be an effective alternative to propofol, as it further reduces the risk of involuntary movements. However, caution is warranted, as ciprofol may increase the risk of dizziness during procedures lasting 10 minutes or longer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003064 | DOI Listing |
Drug Des Devel Ther
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To investigate the effects of ciprofol on postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
Patients And Methods: A total of 138 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomized into two groups: the Ciprofol group (Group C) and the Propofol group (Group P).
Front Pharmacol
August 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Objective: The potential of ciprofol in endoscopic anesthesia is receiving increasing attention. Compared to propofol, ciprofol exhibits stronger sedative effects and requires a lower dosage. This study aimed to compare the safety of ciprofol and propofol in Chinese patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
August 2025
School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Objective: Ciprofol is increasingly being used for sedation and induction of anesthesia in China. However, it remains unclear whether ciprofol is a more appropriate sedative than propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially in the elderly population. This study aimed to compare the safety of ciprofol with propofol in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrug Des Devel Ther
August 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of ciprofol and propofol in general anesthesia for gynecological day surgery.
Patients And Methods: A total of 196 patients undergoing gynecological day surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into ciprofol and propofol group. All patients received total intravenous anesthesia.
J Clin Anesth
September 2025
Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611100, China.
Background: A post-marketing, parallel-controlled clinical trial (REST trial) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cipepofol versus propofol for the induction of anesthesia/sedation in Chinese elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy.
Methods: All enrolled patients aged ≥65 years were assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio to be administered intravenous cipepofol-0.3 mg/kg or propofol-1.