98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breasts represents a significant challenge due to the presence of skin redundancy and potential uncertain vascularization. This study investigates an innovative approach of performing immediate reconstruction using prepectoral polyurethane-covered (PU) implants after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with the aim of avoiding potential complications related to skin-reducing approaches and enhancing cosmetic outcomes.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 62 patients who underwent NSM or SSM followed by immediate prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants between December 2018 and May 2024. The mastectomy weight ranged from 400 to 799g, while the volume of the implants varied from 335 to 680cc. All patients undergoing NSM used the lateral radial approach, patients undergoing SSM used the central elliptical lozenge including only the nipple-areola complex (NAC). The vitality of mastectomy flaps was assessed through intraoperative ICG angiography. Immediate and late complications, as well as aesthetic and functional outcomes, were evaluated. Data were collected and analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of this reconstructive approach.
Results: The analysis revealed a low incidence of early complications (11%), including wound dehiscence (6%), seromas (3%), and infection (2%), all managed conservatively. Late complications occurred in 29 patients (47%), with rippling (19%) and minor contour deformities (18%) affecting 37%. Autologous fat grafting was performed in 29% of cases for correction. Breast heaviness was reported in 8%, and capsular contracture (Grade III-IV) in 2%. No implant malposition or rotation was observed. Aesthetic outcomes (Likert scores: 1.8-1.9) and patient satisfaction (Breast-Q) were high, reflecting good reconstructive and functional results.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates that the approach combining NSM or SSM with prepectoral reconstruction using PU implants is a valid alternative to skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) for large and ptotic breasts. This method offers satisfactory aesthetic and functional results with minimal complication rate, representing a significant advancement in breast reconstruction techniques.
Level Of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05070-w | DOI Listing |
Aesthet Surg J
September 2025
Department of Gynecological and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Background: Total mastectomy for breast cancer is an impactful procedure, and breast reconstruction plays a crucial role for women diagnosed with the disease.
Objectives: The objective of our study is to compare satisfaction, morbidity, and timelines of two breast reconstruction techniques after breast cancer: breast prosthesis and exclusive lipofilling.
Methods: This is a comparative, retrospective, unicentric study on patients who underwent total mastectomy between May 2014 and May 2020.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
September 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
J Robot Surg
September 2025
Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China.
Endoscopic breast surgery (EBS) is designed to reduce surgical trauma and optimize cosmetic outcomes through inconspicuous incisions. However, a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of research focus in EBS is lacking. This study aimed to analyze global publication trends, academic impacts, and evolving research directions in the field of EBS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Plast Surg
September 2025
From the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center-College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN.
Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy remains one of the most frequently used methods of breast reconstruction in the US. Patients with large, ptotic breasts often face poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction with auto-augmentation techniques can minimize problems with acellular dermal matrices (ADM) by using less, and providing the benefit of prepectoral placement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Plast Surg
September 2025
From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Background: Loss of breast sensation following mastectomy and reconstruction significantly impacts quality of life, influencing body image, intimacy, and overall emotional well-being. Despite advances in reconstructive techniques, sensory outcomes remain inconsistent, limiting broader clinical adoption of reinnervation strategies. This educational review synthesizes the current scope of sensory restoration in breast reconstruction, examining approaches to reinnervation, sensory outcome measures, and management of patient expectations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF