Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The prognosis for gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients is generally poor due to the early occurrence of distant metastasis (DM). However, research on predicting the risk of DM in GBC patients is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to apply the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with machine learning (ML) methods to construct a novel model for predicting the risk of DM in GBC patients.
Methods: The data of GBC patients from the SEER database (2000-2020) were divided into a training set and an internal test set in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were then applied to systematically assess the risk factors for DM development. Six ML techniques were subsequently applied to construct a predictive model based on feature selection, validated by ten-fold cross-validation on the training set. Shapley additive interpretation (SHAP) was used to explain the selected models. Additionally, based on the optimal machine learning model, an online calculator was developed to provide personalized DM risk assessment for GBC patients.
Results: Seven key variables were incorporated into the developed machine learning model for analysis. The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model demonstrated high predictive accuracy [Precision = 0.968; Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.885]. In the assessment of risk factors, T, N, grade and age were identified as risk factors for DM in GBC patients. Conversely, rural urban continuum, marital and median household income inflation adj to 2021 were identified as protective factors. Finally, an optimal learning model-based web calculator for personalized DM risk assessment was successfully constructed.
Conclusion: The XGB model was the most effective for predicting DM in GBC patients. This model can assist in developing personalized treatment plans for patients at an early stage, thereby improving prognosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002901 | DOI Listing |