Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Significant variability in Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program content and delivery persists. Quality improvement interventions enhance adherence to standards and reduce variability, yet synthesized evidence of their characteristics and effectiveness in CR is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of quality improvement interventions on CR processes and patient outcomes.

Methods: Scopus, CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies published from January, 2000 to November, 2024. Study selection in Covidence, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were completed. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3, random-effects model. Outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis were reported narratively.

Results: Fifteen studies (76,856 participants) were eligible, including one randomized controlled trial, one retrospective observational study, and 13 pre-post studies. Meta-analysis of 11 studies (17,010 participants) showed that quality improvement interventions significantly improved CR referral (odds ratio [OR] 5.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11, 8.87). From subgroup analyses, patient education had the largest effect (OR 8.37; 95% CI 4.32, 16.21), followed by technology (OR 5.56; 95% CI 2.67, 11.58) and process changes (OR 5.31; 95% CI 2.53, 11.12). Narrative synthesis indicated that quality improvement interventions led to significant improvements in time from discharge to scheduled appointment (1/1 studies), attendance (3/4), prescription of guideline-directed medical therapy (1/1), and completion (1/1). Few studies reported patient outcomes.

Conclusion: Quality improvement interventions improve referral to CR up to eight times. While caution is warranted, quality improvement interventions may also lower waits and increase program utilization. Future studies are needed.

Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024557586.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf067DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality improvement
28
improvement interventions
28
cardiac rehabilitation
8
processes patient
8
1/1 studies
8
improvement
7
interventions
7
studies
7
quality
6
effectiveness quality
4

Similar Publications

Marine ecosystems, particularly estuaries, are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic pressures. The Odiel Estuary has suffered severe contamination from acid mine drainage and industrial activities. Since 1986, mitigation efforts have been implemented, yet their long-term ecological effectiveness remains under-evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of add-on metformin treatment in persons with active epilepsy (a-PWE). This is a single-centric, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomised a-PWE (1:1) to receive either metformin (extended-release 500 mg) or matching placebo for 6 months along with background antiseizure medications. Primary outcome was percentage change in seizure frequency/month, and secondary outcomes were 50% responder rate, serum mTOR expression, and serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), body composition analysis, quality of life (QOL), and safety assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Sleep disturbance is prevalent in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), yet there is limited understanding of individual factors predicting changes in sleep within these populations. Our objective was to determine predictors of sleep disturbance in LTCFs and investigate variation in prevalence across facilities in two Canadian provinces-New Brunswick and Saskatchewan.

Method: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study used interRAI comprehensive health assessment data from 2016 to 2021, encompassing 21,394 older adults aged ≥ 65 years across 228 LTCFs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving Door-In-Door-Out Times for STEMI Transfer Patients: Impact of a Protocolized Autolaunch Process.

JACC Case Rep

July 2025

Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston), Houston, Texas, USA; Texas Emergency Medicine Research Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Background: The timely transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable centers is critical for improving outcomes. Although the American Heart Association recommends a door-in-door-out (DIDO) time of ≤30 minutes, national compliance remains low.

Project Rationale: At Harris Health, no patients with STEMI met this benchmark before 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF