Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Assistive lower-body exoskeletons aim to improve quality of life for broad populations including older adults and people in physically exhausting manual jobs. By applying torque to augment human motion with backdrivable actuators, these devices can reduce human joint effort without restricting volitional motion. However, these backdrivable actuators are coupled by mechanical interfaces to soft tissues of the human body that together introduce resonator dynamics that can delay or diminish the torque assistance. Low interface stiffness and uncompensated dynamics can cause inefficient power delivery to the user, alter their perceived assistance and comfort, and destabilize feedback controllers. We hypothesize that the low stiffness in lateral strap interfaces, like those in the opensource M-BLUE exoskeleton, can be improved by mechanical redesign. Building on the open-source M-BLUE exoskeleton, this paper introduces an alternative interface design that loads the leg through anterior and posterior pads (normal loading) and straps, in which the pads provide extension assistance and the straps provide flexion assistance. We compare the interface dynamics of lateral and normal loading interfaces on N = 10 human subjects using both quasi-static spring measurements and frequency response methods, finding the new design to be 85.7% stiffer $(p<0.01)$ for a range of leg poses and in both flexion and extension loading.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258918PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICORR66766.2025.11062962DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motion backdrivable
8
backdrivable actuators
8
m-blue exoskeleton
8
normal loading
8
human-interface dynamics
4
dynamics knee
4
knee exoskeletons
4
exoskeletons lateral
4
lateral anteroposterior
4
anteroposterior attachment
4

Similar Publications

This study's primary objective was to develop an Active Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AAFO) specifically designed for integration into lower-limb exoskeletons. An analysis of human ankle motion is conducted to inform the development process, guiding the creation of an AAFO that aligns with specifics extrapolated by real data. The AAFO incorporates an electric motor with a non-backdrivable transmission system, engineered to reduce distal mass, minimize power consumption, and enable high-precision position control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assistive lower-body exoskeletons aim to improve quality of life for broad populations including older adults and people in physically exhausting manual jobs. By applying torque to augment human motion with backdrivable actuators, these devices can reduce human joint effort without restricting volitional motion. However, these backdrivable actuators are coupled by mechanical interfaces to soft tissues of the human body that together introduce resonator dynamics that can delay or diminish the torque assistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) affects millions worldwide, yet effective conservative (non-surgical) treatments are still limited. Conventional hip braces cannot reduce painful joint loads associated with contractile forces from flexors and extensors during locomotion. Powered hip exoskeletons could potentially reduce biological hip moments by applying flexion/extension torques, thus attenuating muscle forces that contribute to OA pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Artificial musculoskeletal systems mimic mammalian biomechanics using antagonistic muscles and rigid skeletons. They offer benefits such as adjustable stiffness, back-drivability, and muscle failure tolerance but are difficult to model and control due to redundancies across task, joint, and muscle activation spaces, compounded by complex muscle dynamics and motion-dependent moment arms. Analytical methods require detailed system knowledge and lack scalability, while model-free approaches often rely on manual tuning and rarely exploit motor redundancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study, we developed a unilateral, hybrid exoskeleton designed to augment post-stroke mobility through integration of noninvasive neural stimulation and a motorized knee orthosis. We evaluated proof of concept for this hybrid exoskeleton in a stroke survivor by assessing whether: (1) the motor and transmission possess sufficient backdrivability to facilitate effective muscle-generated movements, (2) the motor can independently drive movement, and (3) the combined application of stimulation and motor generate kinematic improvements superior to either modality used in isolation. The device was evaluated on an ambulatory stroke survivor under four overground walking conditions: (1) without the device, (2) stimulation only while wearing the exoskeleton, (3) motor assistance only, and (4) hybrid stimulated and motorized assistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF