98%
921
2 minutes
20
Phacoemulsification has revolutionized cataract surgery since its introduction by Charles Kelman in 1967, becoming the gold standard for cataract removal in most parts of the world. Despite its widespread adoption and high success rates, there exist controversies within the ophthalmic community regarding various aspects of the procedure. An international panel comprising 25 experts from 18 countries/territories was established by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) to work on this consensus project. A total of 15 sections with 61 consensus statements were evaluated by the panel. Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery was not considered better than Phaco. An interferometer was considered essential for measuring the ocular parameters, and the need to choose an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) formula was stressed. When considering multifocal IOLs, an assessment of the patient's personality profile, and a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of the choice before surgery was essential. Proper informed consent was also essential. The need to address complications like TASS promptly including a reassessment of operating rooms protocols was stressed. Finally, there was general agreement that manual surgeries have a significant role to play in eyes with large, dense nuclei and in populations where low-cost, high-volume surgery was necessary. Manual but sutureless approach was preferred where appropriate. Since there was agreement on about 60 % of the 61 consensus statements, it reflected that there were variations in the real-world practice. Further studies are warranted and a follow-up consensus exercise after more information is available is worth considering.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100224 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
September 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the biocompatibility of hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with uveitis undergoing phacoemulsification, with particular focus on posterior capsule opacification (PCO), postoperative inflammation, and visual outcomes.
Methods: Patients with uveitis who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to account for clinical and demographic variables, yielding 132 eyes (66 per group) for analysis.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol
September 2025
Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre.
Purpose Of Review: Modern presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) offer a potential solution to address the rising postoperative demand and expectations for spectacle independence following cataract surgery. However, IOL calculation and selection becomes more complex when presented with previous corneal refractive surgery (CRS) or co-existing corneal conditions. This review explores the use of presbyopia-correcting IOLs in eyes with co-existing corneal conditions or surgically altered corneas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVestn Oftalmol
September 2025
Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease, Moscow, Russia.
Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation has become the standard method for cataract extraction regardless of its etiology. In modern phaco surgery, implantation of multifocal IOLs is considered the most advanced method for correcting aphakia following lens extraction. The wide range of available multifocal IOLs is promoting the ongoing discussion regarding the advantages of each type, as well as potential strategies for optimizing surgical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Cell Dev Biol
August 2025
Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Purpose: This study aims to explore the factors influencing refractive error following Phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation (PE + IOL) in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), providing a theoretical basis for preoperative consultation and IOL power selection in clinical practice.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 404 PACG patients from Shenzhen Eye Hospital between 2019 and 2024. Preoperative ocular biometric parameters and combined surgical approaches were evaluated using Spearman correlation, multinomial logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Clin Ophthalmol
August 2025
Brussels Eye Doctors, Brussels, Belgium.
Purpose: To show the clinical outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with previous laser-corneal-refractive-surgery (LCRS) or radial keratotomy (RK).
Methods: Eyes with previous LCRS (LASIK/PRK group) or RK (RK group) implanted with a diffractive trifocal IOL were enrolled in this retrospective study. Refraction and monocular Snellen decimal uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), and uncorrected-near visual acuity (UNVA) were analyzed at 1-year.