Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Pregnant people are often excluded from clinical trials, primarily due to safety concerns. However, exclusion causes population-level harms as well as sometimes providing individual protection. Harms caused to pregnant people by exclusion from clinical trials have been clearly evidenced and highlighted during the COVID pandemic. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has since provided guidance on improving inclusion of under-served groups, which includes pregnant people, in clinical research. Appropriate inclusion and active facilitation to participate are required to provide equitable evidence-based healthcare during pregnancy and to comply with ethical principles for research.

Methods: We carried out an exploratory, online, cross-sectional survey of trialists to assess whether, why, and how pregnant people are included or excluded from clinical trials funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, with awards starting in 2022-2023. Trialists were the respondents, with trials the primary focus of this survey. Invitations were sent to trialists between October 2023 and March 2024. Summary statistics were calculated to describe the characteristics of the trials and respondents, to describe eligibility of pregnant people, reasons for this, and how this eligibility is documented and implemented.

Results: We identified 120 trials of which 88 were eligible for this survey. Responses were received for 81 trials. Pregnant people are excluded from 34 of these 81 trials. Pregnant people are eligible for inclusion in 40 of the 81 trials, including four which partially exclude people during pregnancy. Eligibility is unclear for seven trials. Exclusions are mostly for safety reasons. Sponsors and regulatory authorities are unnecessary barriers to inclusion in some trials. Eight trials of 40 trials make explicit or deliberate attempts to include people during pregnancy.

Conclusions: A minority of the 120 trials include people during pregnancy. Most trials for which pregnant people are eligible do not report explicitly including people during pregnancy or facilitating their inclusion. A small number of trials, different in setting, clinical area, and intervention type, are intentionally designed and conducted in a way that include people during pregnancy. There are clear opportunities to improve the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials in the NIHR HTA Programme.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232068PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08949-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pregnant people
40
trials
17
clinical trials
16
people pregnancy
16
people
14
trials pregnant
12
include people
12
pregnant
10
people excluded
8
excluded clinical
8

Similar Publications

Effects of an Oral Health Management Program During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Oral Dis

September 2025

Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang, University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a Health Belief Model-based oral health management program on self-efficacy, oral health behaviors, and three periodontal clinical indicators among pregnant women.

Study Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 65 participants randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 39) and control (n = 26) groups. The intervention included one face-to-face education, three video calls, two online lectures, and regular follow-up supervision in 1 month, while the control group received one face-to-face education.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A prospective study of physical activity in full-term pregnant women and its effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

September 2025

Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address:

Background: The effects of physical activity (PA), especially brisk walking, on labor outcomes and pregnancy health have not been clearly established. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PA and cervical ripeness and pregnancy outcomes in term pregnant women.

Basic Procedures: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 52 pregnant women (30.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hemoglobin estimation (Hb) is the most requested hematology test, especially among pregnant/postnatal women and people living with HIV (PLHIV). In Uganda, several point-of-care (POC) Hb testing devices are currently used and performance may be affected by multiple factors. This study evaluated the diagnostic and analytic performance of four Hb POC devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We aimed to describe the prevalence of exposure to traumatic events and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC) in rural Ethiopia. We hypothesised that antenatal PTSD symptoms would be associated with previous obstetric complications and intimate partner violence (IPV) and impact negatively on women´s satisfaction with ANC.

Methods: The design was a facility-based cross-sectional study in primary health centres providing ANC in southern Ethiopia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF