98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Effective prediction methods for monitoring the risk of recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) and guiding postoperative adjuvant treatment (ACT) are currently lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the value of postoperative dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring in guiding ACT and predicting recurrence compared with other clinicopathological factors.
Methods: This prospective study enrolled 414 consecutive patients with CRLM who underwent radical resection. Regular dynamic ctDNA monitoring was performed every 3 months until 1 year postoperatively or on clinical recurrence. ctDNA detection was performed using the J25 detection panel, previously constructed and verified at our center.
Results: Postoperative ctDNA status at 1 month [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.37-5.59, P <0.0001] significantly distinguished long-term survival. ctDNA-positive patients (HR = 0.228, 95% CI 0.116-0.446, P <0.0001) benefitted more from ACT than ctDNA-negative patients ( P = 0.39). Dynamic assessment of ctDNA status at 1 and 3-6 months postoperatively showed a significantly better prognosis in patients who remained negative or converted to negative than in those who remained positive (HR = 11.20, 95% CI 3.90-32.22, P <0.0001) or negative turned positive (HR = 3.61, 95% CI 1.31-9.98, P = 0.023). ctDNA status post-ACT and 1-month post-surgery exhibited higher area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC = 0.73 and 0.71) for recurrence-free survival than that of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (AUROC = 0.53) or pathological tumor regression grade (AUROC = 0.55).
Conclusion: The J25 panel showed good performance for dynamic monitoring of ctDNA levels after radical resection of CRLM, improving static prognosis prediction, dynamic recurrence monitoring, and further guidance on ACT and early recurrence intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002504 | DOI Listing |
J Immunother Precis Oncol
August 2025
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Introduction: Patients with advanced solid tumors may be considered for early phase clinical trials investigating the safety, tolerability, and dosing of experimental therapies. Optimizing participant selection is critical to maximize clinical benefit and meet trial endpoints with fewer participants. One in six participants does not meet routine life expectancy requirements (>3 months), highlighting the need for improved prognostication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsia Pac J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Purpose: This study aimed to identify breast cancer-specific circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation markers that correspond to tissue DNA methylation.
Methods: Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we selected breast cancer-specific DNA methylation markers. The methylation and expression patterns of candidate genes were analyzed in breast cancer cell lines and tissue samples.
Nat Med
September 2025
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is standard of care in advanced diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM), but its role in the perioperative management of DPM is unclear. In tandem, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ultra-sensitive residual disease detection has shown promise in providing a molecular readout of ICB efficacy across resectable cancers. This phase 2 trial investigated neoadjuvant nivolumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab in resectable DPM along with tumor-informed liquid biopsy residual disease assessments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Liq Biopsy
September 2025
Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Liquid biopsy, specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, has emerged as a transformative tool in precision oncology, providing real-time, minimally invasive characterizations of the tumor and tumor dynamics. While tissue biopsy is a critical tool for baseline diagnosis of malignancy, it is often limited by sampling constraints and an inability to capture tumor heterogeneity. In this study, we explored the clinical utility of serial ctDNA testing in guiding therapeutic decisions across a cohort of 30 patients with diverse solid tumors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransl Oncol
September 2025
Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Clinical Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address:
Liquid biopsies, particularly those involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patient blood, have emerged as crucial and minimally invasive adjuncts to standard tissue-based testing. ctDNA testing enables the identification of actionable mutations for targeted therapy and can be routinely used when tissue samples are unavailable for genotyping. Compared to tissue-based testing, ctDNA testing has the advantages of capturing spatial or temporal genomic heterogeneity and facilitating repeated assessments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF