Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: In non-clinical safety evaluation of drugs, pathological result is one of the gold standards for determining toxic effects. However, pathological diagnosis might be challenging and affected by pathologist expertise. In carcinogenicity studies, drug-induced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the mouse stomach represents a diagnostic challenge for toxicopathologists. This study aims to establish a detection model for mouse gastric squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC) using deep learning algorithms, to improve the accuracy and consistency of pathological diagnoses.
Methods: A total of 93 cases of drug-induced mouse GSCC and 56 cases of normal mouse stomach tissue from carcinogenicity studies were collected. After scanning into digital slides, semi-automated data annotation was performed. All images underwent preprocessing, including tissue extraction, artifact removal, and exclusion of normal epithelial regions. The images were then randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. Five different convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-FCN, LR-ASPP, DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and DenseNet were applied to identify GSCC and non-GSCC regions. Tumor prediction images (algorithm results shown as overlays) derived from the slide images were compared, and the performance of the constructed models was evaluated using Precision, Recall, and F1-score.
Results: The Precision, Recall, and F1-scores of DenseNet, U-Net, and DeepLabv3 + algorithms were all above 90%. Specifically, the DenseNet model achieved an overall Precision of 0.9044, Recall of 0.9291, and F1-score of 0.9157 in the test set. Compared to the other algorithms, DenseNet exhibited the highest F1-score and Recall, demonstrating superior generalization ability.
Conclusion: The DenseNet algorithm model developed in this study shown promising application potential for assisting in the diagnosis of mouse GSCC. As artificial intelligence (AI) technology continues to advance in non-clinical safety evaluation of drugs, CNN-based toxicological pathology detection models will become essential tools to assist pathologists in precise diagnosis and consistency evaluation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106445 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1587417 | DOI Listing |