Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in eyes with previous myopic laser vision correction (LVC), and to assess the impact of axial length (AL) on the formula performance.
Methods: A total of 108 eyes were included, with 52 eyes in the AL less than 28 mm group and 56 eyes in the AL 28 mm or greater group. Refractive prediction errors (RPEs) were compared among nine post-LVC formulas: Haigis-TK, Haigis-TK (incorporating Cooke-modified axial length [CMAL]), PEARL-DGS, Hoffer-QST TK, LISA TK, Barrett True-K TK, EVO TK, Haigis-L, and Shammas. Pearson correlation analysis was employed to evaluate the influence of AL and other biometric parameters on RPEs.
Results: In the AL less than 28 mm group, no significant differences were observed between all formulas (all adjusted > .05). However, in the AL 28 mm or greater group, Haigis-TK demonstrated significantly lower root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) and mean absolute error (MAE) compared to the Hoffer-QST, Barrett True-K TK, Shammas, and Haigis-L (all adjusted < .001). Similarly, the PEARL-DGS showed significantly lower RMSAE than the Barrett True-K TK, Shammas, and Haigis-L (both adjusted < .001), and significantly lower MAE compared to the Barrett True-K TK and Haigis-L (both adjusted < .001). The Haigis-TK had the highest percentage of eyes with RPEs within ±0.50 diopters (D) (73.21%), whereas the PEARL-DGS had the highest percentage of eyes with RPEs within ±1.00 D (94.64%). A significant negative correlation between AL and RPE was found in most formulas, leading to a myopic shift in eyes with extremely long AL.
Conclusions: The performance of current post-LVC formulas was comparable in eyes with AL less than 28 mm, whereas the Haigis-TK and PEARL-DGS demonstrated superior accuracy in eyes with AL 28 mm or greater. A notable myopic shift occurred in post-LVC eyes with extremely long AL, highlighting the need for careful formula selection in such cases. .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250328-01 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation in a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens After Myopic LASIK.
J Refract Surg
September 2025
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany and.
Purpose: To evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) without historical data.
Methods: In this consecutive case series, patients who had undergone lens surgery with implantation of a non-diffractive EDOF IOL after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, were included. Preoperative assessments included biometry and tomography using Scheimpflug technology (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).
Accuracy of PEARL-DGS Formula for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Patients With Previous Myopic Laser Vision Correction.
J Refract Surg
September 2025
From the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of a new machine learning-based open-source IOL formula (PEARLS-DGS) in 100 patients who underwent uncomplicated cataract surgery and had a history of laser refractive surgery for myopic defects.
Methods: The setting for this retrospective study was HUMANITAS Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Data from 100 patients with a history of photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis were retrospectively analyzed to assess the accuracy of the formula.
Corneal multifocality after penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty is associated with intraocular lens power calculation error.
Br J Ophthalmol
August 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan
Aim: The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and to identify the causes of predictive errors (PEs) in relation to the subjective keratometric (K) value (SK) in eyes with corneal multifocality.
Methods: This retrospective study included 74 eyes that underwent cataract surgery after PK or DALK. PEs were compared between SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II (BUII) and Kane formulas.
Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan.
Jpn J Ophthalmol
September 2025
Miyata Eye Hospital, Kurahara 6-3, Miyakonojo, Miyazaki, 885-0051, Japan.
Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of seven no-history intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in post-myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC) eyes in Japanese patients.
Study Design: Multicenter retrospective case series.
Methods: This study included patients with previous M-LVC who underwent cataract surgery between 2016 and 2023.
The accuracy of VRF intraocular lens power calculation formula in cataract patients after radial keratotomy.
Int Ophthalmol
July 2025
Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of the VRF intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula in cataract patients after radial keratotomy (RK).
Methods: This was a retrospective study that reviewed and retrieved the medical history of patients after RK who underwent cataract surgery from April 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024, at Beijing Tongren Hospital. A total of 50 eyes of 27 patients were included.