98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are both recommended as first-line antihypertensive agents for patients with diabetes. While pharmacological mechanisms suggest that ACEIs may provide better cardiovascular protection than ARBs, this potential benefit has not been fully established in previous observational studies of patients with diabetes.
Methods: An active-comparator new-user design within target trial emulation framework was implemented using Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database (YRHCD). We compared risks of major cardiovascular events (MACE) between older patients (age ≥ 65 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) newly exposed to ACEIs and ARBs from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were 3-point MACE, including hospitalized myocardial infarction, hospitalized stroke, and all-cause mortality (a proxy for cardiovascular mortality). We also assessed 4-point MACE, which further included hospitalized heart failure. Propensity scores were calculated to balance 44 identified confounders. Marginal structure models were applied to estimate per-protocol hazard ratios.
Results: A total of 18,558 individuals were included, with 1,641 initiating ACEIs and 16,917 initiating ARBs. Their median age was 72 years and 45% were male. The adjusted hazard ratio for ACEIs vs. ARBs was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.10) for 3-point MACE and 0.83 (95% CI 0.69-0.99) for 4-point MACE. The 1-year absolute risk differences were - 0.30% (95% CI - 1.80-1.21%) for 3-point MACE and - 1.16% (95% CI - 2.97-0.66%) for 4-point MACE. Results were consistent across subgroup analyses (stratified by age, sex, as well as baseline major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, other antihypertensive therapy, insulin therapy, and calendar year) and sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Among older patients with T2DM, the initiation of ACEIs was associated with a trend toward lower risk of MACE compared to ARBs, implying the potential cardiovascular benefits of ACEIs in this population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057007 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02753-1 | DOI Listing |
Diabetes Obes Metab
September 2025
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Aims: In this first interim analysis of the SCORE study, we investigated the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and overweight/obesity but without diabetes who initiated semaglutide 2.4 mg in real-world settings.
Materials And Methods: Individuals initiating semaglutide 2.
Int Urol Nephrol
September 2025
Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Xuzhou Children's Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No. 18, Sudi North Road, Quanshan District, Xuzhou City, 221000, China.
Purpose: While SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA show cardiorenal benefits, their comparative efficacy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in elderly T2DM patients.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1,015 propensity score-matched elderly T2DM patients (SGLT-2i group: n = 583; GLP-1RA group: n = 432).
Cardiovasc Diabetol
August 2025
Department of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.
Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. However, real-world evidence comparing the CV effectiveness and safety of major hypoglycemic drug classes remains limited in this population. This multicenter pooled analysis aims to directly compare the CV outcomes and safety profiles of these key agents in patients with T2D and hypertension.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Gerontol Geriatr
November 2025
Baylor College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA; Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano, TX, USA; Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
Background: Older adults face high cardiovascular (CV) and kidney risk but may be underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While GLP-1RAs have been shown to provide CV and kidney benefits, estimates for efficacy and safety endpoints among older adults remain less certain. This meta-analysis assesses their impact on CV and kidney outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cardiol
December 2025
1st Department of Cardiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Icosapent ethyl (IPE) has been shown to reduce adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in high or very high-risk patients on statins with triglyceride (TG) levels between 135 and 499 mg/dL METHODS: The CALLINICUS-Hellas registry is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter study evaluating lipid profiles, adherence to lipid-lowering therapies, and prognosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This analysis included patients with lipids assessed 4-12 weeks post-ACS who were divided into two groups: Those eligible for IPE administration according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias and those not eligible. Cardiometabolic profile at discharge and the incidence of 3-point major adverse CV events [3P-MACE; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, cardiac death] within 12 months were compared between groups RESULTS: A total of 1254 patients had their lipid profile evaluated 4-12 weeks post-discharge and the vast majority (97.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF