Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, lymph node (LN) status is classified as ypN0 and ypN+. However, ypN0 includes patients who either had LN metastasis before neoadjuvant therapy (cN+/ypN0) or those who never developed LN metastasis (cN0/ypN0). The prognostic implications of these different LN statuses are not well understood.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy at 4 centers in China from 2019 to 2022. Patients were grouped by their LN status into ``natural'' N0 (cN0/ypN0), ``downstaged'' N0 (cN+/ypN0), and ypN+ (cN+/ypN+).

Results: Out of 527 initially enrolled patients, 186 met the inclusion criteria: 34 (18.3%) had ``natural'' N0, 95 (51.1%) had ``downstaged'' N0, and 57 (30.6%) had ypN+. The median follow-up was 24 months (11-64 months). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly lower in ypN+ compared to ``natural'' N0 and ``downstaged'' N0 (DFS: P < .001; OS: P < .001). However, no significant difference in either DFS (P = .695) or OS (P = .814) were observed between ``natural'' N0 and ``downstaged'' N0. Subgroup analysis showed that the MPR/ypN0 group had significantly better DFS compared to the non-MPR/ypN0 (P = .008), MPR/ypN+ (P = .028), and non-MPR/ypN+ groups (P < .001). For OS, MPR/ypN0 group was significantly superior to non-MPR/ypN+ (P < .001) and showed a trend toward better OS than non-MPR/ypN0 (P = .067) and MPR/ypN+ (P = .067). Notably, no significant differences were observed in either DFS (P = .908) or OS (P = .943) between non-MPR/ypN0 and MPR/ypN+ groups. The non-MPR/ypN+ group had the poorest survival outcomes in both DFS and OS.

Conclusions: Achieving ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy strongly predicts favorable outcomes in patients with NSCLC, regardless of pretreatment cN status. Combining MPR with LN status effectively differentiates patient prognoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.04.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy
16
prognostic implications
8
lymph node
8
node status
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
patients nsclc
8
``natural'' ``downstaged''
8
mpr/ypn0 group
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Background: Trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (chemoIO) have changed the standard of care for resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study characterizes the outcomes of off-trial patients who received treatment with neoadjuvant chemoIO.

Methods: The authors analyzed records of patients with stage IB-III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemoIO with an intent to proceed to surgical resection at three US academic institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy shows promise for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), optimal regimen selection remains challenging. This study compares perioperative outcomes between camrelizumab- and tislelizumab-based neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in ESCC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 209 clinical stage II-IVA ESCC patients treated at Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital (October 2020-December 2023) who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (camrelizumab, n=119; tislelizumab, n=90) followed by esophagectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are linked to prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether the distribution, abundance, and maturity of TLSs affect therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in ESCC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (NRCI) remains unclear. We explored TLS characteristics and correlated them with patient survival.

Methods: A total of 157 resectable ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy between September 2020 and May 2023 were divided into NRCI (n=49) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI, n=108) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reduction in surgical scope after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Oncol Lett

November 2025

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518116, P.R. China.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is a crucial treatment modality for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whilst neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy enables tumor downstaging, the impact of reducing the surgical scope (such as from pneumonectomy to lobectomy) on safety and efficacy remains unvalidated in real-world settings. The present study aimed to use real-world data to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of several surgical methods following neoadjuvant treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF