A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Ablation characteristics associated with steam pops in ablation index-guided radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Steam pops present a significant concern during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is crucial to analyse the incidence and ablation characteristics associated with steam pops. This study aims to investigate the occurrence and potential predictors of steam pops.

Methods And Results: This study included 3263 patients with AF who underwent RF ablation. Patients with paroxysmal AF received bilateral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, while those with persistent AF underwent additional linear ablation. The ablation parameters at the sites of steam pops were compared to those at adjacent anatomical locations. A total of 81 steam pops (2.5%) with one pericardial tamponade were recorded. Steam pops were observed at liner ablation sites: 6 (0.4%) at the mitral isthmus, 16 (0.9%) at the tricuspid isthmus (CTI), and 7 (0.5%) along the roofline. The most common sites of steam pops were the anterior edge of the left superior PV and the inferior vena cava side of the CTI. The impedance drop was significantly higher (18.2 ± 9.5 Ω vs. 13.5 ± 4.8 Ω, P < 0.001) at steam pop sites. The optimal cut-off points of impedance drop for predicting steam pops were > 9.5 Ω within the first 3 s, > 10.5 Ω within the first 5 s, > 13.5 Ω within the first 10 s, and > 18.5 Ω in the whole ablation, respectively.

Conclusion: The incidence of steam pops during ablation of AF is infrequent. Impedance drop is the only ablation parameter that could predict the occurrence of steam pops.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019224PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf084DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

steam pops
40
ablation
13
steam
12
impedance drop
12
pops
10
ablation characteristics
8
characteristics associated
8
associated steam
8
pops ablation
8
radiofrequency ablation
8

Similar Publications