Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are at high risk for ventricular tachycardia (VT), and data on VT ablation in patients with LVAD are scarce. This multicentre registry assessed the mechanism of VT, procedural parameters, and outcome of VT ablation in patients with LVAD (NCT06063811).

Methods And Results: Data of patients with LVAD referred for VT ablation at nine tertiary care centres were collected retrospectively. Parameters included VT mechanisms, procedural data, VT recurrence, and mortality. Overall, 69 patients (90% male, mean age 60.7 ± 8.4 years) undergoing 72 ablation procedures were included. Most procedures were conducted after intensification of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment (18/72; 25%) or a prior combination of ≥2 AADs (31/72; 43%). Endocardial low-voltage areas were detected in all patients. The predominant VT mechanism was scar-related re-entry (76/96 VTs; 79%), and 19/96 VTs (20%) were related to the LVAD cannula. Non-inducibility of any VT was achieved in 28/72 procedures (39%). No LVAD-related complication was observed. The extent of endocardial scar was associated with VT recurrence. The median follow-up was 283 days (interquartile range 70-587 days). A total of 3/69 patients were lost to follow-up, 10/69 (14%) were transplanted, 26/69 (38%) died, and 16/69 (23%) patients were free from VT.

Conclusion: Although often a last resort, VT ablation in patients with LVAD is feasible and safe when performed in experienced centres. These patients suffer from a high scar burden, and cardiomyopathy-associated rather than cannula-related scar seems to be the dominant substrate. Ventricular tachycardia recurrence is high despite extensive treatment, and the overall prognosis is limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983390PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients lvad
16
ventricular tachycardia
12
ablation patients
12
patients
11
patients left
8
left ventricular
8
ventricular assist
8
ablation
6
lvad
5
characterization ventricular
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a highly effective procedure for the management of selected advanced heart failure patients, prolonging patient life and improving quality. Additional cardiac pathologies, especially valvular regurgitation or coronary heart disease, are common in LVAD recipients, whereas reports on the surgical management of heart failure combined with aortic disease are rare.

Case Presentation: We present a case of a 60-year-old patient with an aortic sinus aneurysm, aortic regurgitation, and end-stage heart failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Repair or Replacement in Patients with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

September 2025

Division of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. Electronic address:

Objective: Our objective was to determine the long-term outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (TVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received HeartMate II or 3 from 2004 to 2023. Nine patients who had a previous TVP were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Strategic Approach Towards the Evaluation of HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Devices Using Multimodality Imaging.

Am J Cardiol

August 2025

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension, Rutgers University - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, East Tower - 8th Floor, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States. Electronic address:

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has increased in recent years as a destination therapy. The HeartMate 3 (HM3) is currently the only commercially available LVAD for implantation in the United States. Societal guidelines for multimodality cardiac imaging evaluation of LVADs and temporary mechanical support devices were recently published and serve as a comprehensive resource for the evaluation of LVAD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of pump position on postoperative outcomes in less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

Front Cardiovasc Med

August 2025

Department of Cardiac Surgery and Research Group for Experimental Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Introduction: less invasive approach (LIS) has recently become increasingly used for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the impact of surgical access on pump position and clinical outcomes comparing LIS-LVAD implantation to full sternotomy (ST) has not been well discussed.

Methods: Between April 2010 and February 2021, a total of 237 consecutive patients received a LVAD, 76 (32.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are a life-threatening complication of patients with end-stage left ventricular dysfunction, and are a frequent cause for considering advanced therapies. Their management in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) presents unique challenges, requiring a multidisciplinary approach to tailored strategies.

Case Summary: We present the case of a 70-year-old male with a history of VTs who underwent HeartMate 3 (Abbott, USA) implantation for advanced heart failure secondary to ischaemic cardiomyopathy and refractory VTs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF